Bertran Auvert: Difference between revisions

Add category; Wikify.
 
(3 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 21: Line 21:
|}
|}


'''Bertran Auvert''' is a [[Bias|biased]] pro-circumcision researcher of French origin who has been a circumcision proponent since at least 2003.<ref>{{REFjournal
'''Bertran Auvert''' is a [[Bias|biased]] pro-circumcision researcher of French origin who has been a [[circumcision]] proponent since at least 2003.<ref>{{REFjournal
  |last=Rain-Taljaard
  |last=Rain-Taljaard
  |init=RC
  |init=RC
Line 43: Line 43:
  |issue=3
  |issue=3
  |pages=315-327
  |pages=315-327
}}</ref> Auvert was responsible for one of the three latest African circumcision trials,<ref name="Auvert PLoS">{{RCT Auvert et al 2005}}</ref> which are being used by the [[WHO|World Health Organization]] to endorse [[circumcision]] as an [[HIV]] prevention method.<ref>{{REFweb
}}</ref> Auvert was responsible for the first (2005) of the three discredited African circumcision trials,<ref name="Auvert PLoS">{{RCT Auvert et al 2005}}</ref> which are still being used by the [[WHO|World Health Organization]] to promote [[circumcision]] as an [[HIV]] prevention method.<ref>{{REFweb
  |last=World Health Oranization
  |last=World Health Oranization
  |first=
  |first=
  |author-link=WHO
  |author-link=WHO
  |year=
  |year=2007
  |title=WHO Male circumcision for HIV prevention
  |title=WHO Male circumcision for HIV prevention
  |url=http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/index.html
  |url=http://www.who.int/hiv/topics/malecircumcision/en/index.html
Line 74: Line 74:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


== Auvert's Circumcision Study ==
== Auvert's circumcision study ==
An {{#tip-text:RCT|Randomized controlled trial}} funded by the United States [[National Institutes of Health]] (NIH)<ref name='DOC 2008'>{{REFnews
An {{#tip-text:RCT|Randomized controlled trial}} funded by the United States [[National Institutes of Health]] (NIH)<ref name='DOC 2008'>{{REFnews
  |url=http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/info/HIVStatement.html
  |url=http://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/info/HIVStatement.html
Line 107: Line 107:


Boyle & Hill (2011) have shown these coordinated RCTs to be have significant methodological flaws and statistical errors that render their claims invalid. Although a 60 percent ''relative'' reduction in [[HIV]] was claimed, the ''absolute'' reduction was a statistically insignificant 1.3 percent.<ref name="boyle-hill2011">{{BoyleGJ HillG 2011}}</ref>
Boyle & Hill (2011) have shown these coordinated RCTs to be have significant methodological flaws and statistical errors that render their claims invalid. Although a 60 percent ''relative'' reduction in [[HIV]] was claimed, the ''absolute'' reduction was a statistically insignificant 1.3 percent.<ref name="boyle-hill2011">{{BoyleGJ HillG 2011}}</ref>
== Population-based studies ==
{{Population-based studies}}


{{PUB}}
{{PUB}}
Line 160: Line 163:


[[Category:Circumcision in Africa]]
[[Category:Circumcision in Africa]]
[[Category:Author]]
[[Category:Promoter]]


[[Category:From CircLeaks]]
[[Category:From CircLeaks]]