Difference between revisions of "Kristen O'Hara"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (using template PhotoMissing) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add external link.) |
||
| (2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
|note= | |note= | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
* [[Dyspareunia]] | * [[Dyspareunia]] | ||
* [[Gliding action]] | * [[Gliding action]] | ||
| + | * [[Intactivism]] | ||
| + | * [[Sex_As_Nature_Intended_It]] | ||
| + | * [[Sexual effects of circumcision]] | ||
* [[Vagina]] | * [[Vagina]] | ||
| − | + | * [[United States of America]] | |
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||
* {{URLwebsite|http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/|2021-07-03}} | * {{URLwebsite|http://www.sexasnatureintendedit.com/|2021-07-03}} | ||
| − | + | * {{REFnews | |
| + | |title=A Cut Below | ||
| + | |url=https://www.cirp.org/news/2007/2007-07-15_SFChronicle.php | ||
| + | |last=Guthmann | ||
| + | |first=Edward | ||
| + | |init= | ||
| + | |author-link= | ||
| + | |publisher=San Francisco Chronicle | ||
| + | |website= | ||
| + | |date=2007-07-15 | ||
| + | |accessdate=2024-07-28 | ||
| + | |quote=People are vociferous on the [[foreskin]] question, none more than Kristen O'Hara, the author of "Sex as Nature Intended It" (2002), in which she claims women are more likely to enjoy intercourse if their male partner is uncircumcised. | ||
| + | }} | ||
{{DEFAULTSORT:O'Hara, Kristen}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:O'Hara, Kristen}} | ||
[[Category:Person]] | [[Category:Person]] | ||
[[Category:Female]] | [[Category:Female]] | ||
| − | + | [[Category:Female sexuality]] | |
[[Category:Author]] | [[Category:Author]] | ||
[[Category:Intactivist]] | [[Category:Intactivist]] | ||
[[Category:USA]] | [[Category:USA]] | ||
Latest revision as of 22:05, 28 July 2024
Kristen O'Hara is an American author and intactivist. O'Hara has focused her work in part on the contribution of the male foreskin to the needs of women.
Publications
O'Hara K, O'Hara J. The effect of male circumcision on the sexual enjoyment of the female partner. BJU Int. 1 January 1999; 83 Suppl 1: 79-84. PMID. DOI. Retrieved 5 July 2021.
O'Hara K, O'Hara J (2000): Sex As Nature Intended It. Edition: 2. Hudson, MA: Turning Point Publications. Retrieved 5 July 2021.
See also
- Dyspareunia
- Gliding action
- Intactivism
- Sex_As_Nature_Intended_It
- Sexual effects of circumcision
- Vagina
- United States of America
External links
Official website. Retrieved 3 July 2021
Guthmann, Edward (15 July 2007)."A Cut Below", San Francisco Chronicle. Retrieved 28 July 2024.
Quote:People are vociferous on the foreskin question, none more than Kristen O'Hara, the author of "Sex as Nature Intended It" (2002), in which she claims women are more likely to enjoy intercourse if their male partner is uncircumcised.
