Richard Duncker: Difference between revisions

(3 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown)

Line 1:

[[File:RichardDuncker2019.jpg|thumb|Richard Duncker 2019]]

'''Richard Duncker''' is a ~~british~~ [[Intactivists|intactivist]], chair of the UK charity, [[Genital Autonomy]], and founder of [[Men Do Complain]].

'''Richard Duncker''' is a British [[Intactivists|intactivist]], chair of the UK charity, [[Genital Autonomy]], and founder of [[Men Do Complain]].

Richard Duncker created the [[Bloodstained Men|Bloodstained Suit]] and wore the first suit in a [[Men Do Complain]] demonstration in the UK outside the Department of Health in Whitehall.

==Video==

Video interview by [[James Loewen]] for the [http://intactwiki.org/wiki/Category:Bonobo3D_channel Bonobo3D Youtube Channel], recorded in Helsinki, [[Finland]], October 2012:

<youtube>I53bgxGl88A</youtube>

Line 12:

|Text=Thank you to everyone involved for organising this timely opportunity to mark the 8th anniversary of the [[Cologne circumcision court judgment|ruling by the Cologne Court]] that non-therapeutic male circumcision is actual bodily harm. That ruling was immediately [[German Circumcision Act|politically sidelined]]. But the thought is out there in the political, public and judicial domains.

The idea that is OK to cut a healthy bit off a healthy child is a hard thing to justify. There are now an ever growing number of academics from various disciplines examining circumcision with un-blinkered eyes. The physical sciences now quite clearly show that the [[foreskin]] is specialised erogenous tissue. The lawyers, ethicists, and philosophers are no longer afraid to tackle the issue of non-therapeutic genital cutting, and many have pointed to the alarming way basic rights are denied to a great many children, boys, girls, and those born with variations of genital anatomy.

The idea that is OK to cut a healthy bit off a healthy child is a hard thing to justify. There are now an ever growing number of academics from various disciplines examining [[circumcision]] with un-blinkered eyes. The physical sciences now quite clearly show that the [[foreskin]] is specialised erogenous tissue. The lawyers, ethicists, and philosophers are no longer afraid to tackle the issue of non-therapeutic genital cutting, and many have pointed to the alarming way basic rights are denied to a great many children, boys, girls, and those born with variations of genital anatomy.

The [[Religion and culture|religions and cultures]] that practice non-therapeutic genital cutting now have a growing body of people within them who are questioning the practices.

Line 30:

<youtube>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VhcVUQRbns&list=PLP3sy53e5kvFnGCYvkFmpJz9dGS0dzkcX&index=4</youtube>

* [[United Kingdom]]

Line 43:

Line 46:

[[Category:BSM]]

[[Category:Intactivist]]

[[Category:WWDOGA contributor]]

[[Category:UK]]

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 [[File:RichardDuncker2019.jpg|thumb|Richard Duncker 2019]]
-'''Richard Duncker''' is a british [[Intactivists|intactivist]], chair of the UK charity, [[Genital Autonomy]], and founder of [[Men Do Complain]].
+'''Richard Duncker''' is a British [[Intactivists|intactivist]], chair of the UK charity, [[Genital Autonomy]], and founder of [[Men Do Complain]].
 Richard Duncker created the [[Bloodstained Men|Bloodstained Suit]] and wore the first suit in a [[Men Do Complain]] demonstration in the UK outside the Department of Health in Whitehall.
+==Video==
 Video interview by [[James Loewen]] for the [http://intactwiki.org/wiki/Category:Bonobo3D_channel Bonobo3D Youtube Channel], recorded in Helsinki, [[Finland]], October 2012:
 <youtube>I53bgxGl88A</youtube>
@@ Line 12: / Line 12: @@
   |Text=Thank you to everyone involved for organising this timely opportunity to mark the 8th anniversary of the [[Cologne circumcision court judgment|ruling by the Cologne Court]] that non-therapeutic male circumcision is actual bodily harm. That ruling was immediately [[German Circumcision Act|politically sidelined]]. But the thought is out there in the political, public and judicial domains.
-The idea that is OK to cut a healthy bit off a healthy child is a hard thing to justify. There are now an ever growing number of academics from various disciplines examining circumcision with un-blinkered eyes. The physical sciences now quite clearly show that the [[foreskin]] is specialised erogenous tissue. The lawyers, ethicists, and philosophers are no longer afraid to tackle the issue of non-therapeutic genital cutting, and many have pointed to the alarming way basic rights are denied to a great many children, boys, girls, and those born with variations of genital anatomy.
+The idea that is OK to cut a healthy bit off a healthy child is a hard thing to justify. There are now an ever growing number of academics from various disciplines examining [[circumcision]] with un-blinkered eyes. The physical sciences now quite clearly show that the [[foreskin]] is specialised erogenous tissue. The lawyers, ethicists, and philosophers are no longer afraid to tackle the issue of non-therapeutic genital cutting, and many have pointed to the alarming way basic rights are denied to a great many children, boys, girls, and those born with variations of genital anatomy.
 The [[Religion and culture|religions and cultures]] that practice non-therapeutic genital cutting now have a growing body of people within them who are questioning the practices.
@@ Line 30: / Line 30: @@
 <youtube>https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2VhcVUQRbns&list=PLP3sy53e5kvFnGCYvkFmpJz9dGS0dzkcX&index=4</youtube>
+{{SEEALSO}}
+* [[United Kingdom]]
 {{LINKS}}
@@ Line 43: / Line 46: @@
 [[Category:BSM]]
 [[Category:Intactivist]]
+[[Category:WWDOGA contributor]]
 [[Category:UK]]