Epispasm: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add category. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add citation. |
||
| (7 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|first= | |first= | ||
|accessdate=2020-07-17 | |accessdate=2020-07-17 | ||
}}</ref> Epispasm was popular in the First Century among [[circumcised]] Jewish men who wished to | }}</ref> Epispasm was popular in the First Century among [[circumcised]] Jewish men who wished to pass as [[intact]] Greek.<ref>}} | ||
* {{REFjournal | |||
|last=Kennedy | |||
|first= | |||
|init=A | |||
|author-link=Amanda Kennedy | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=Masculinity and Embodiment in the Practice of Foreskin Restoration | |||
|language= | |||
|journal=International Journal of Men's Health | |||
|date=2015 | |||
|season=Spring | |||
|volume=14 | |||
|issue=1 | |||
|pages=38-54 | |||
|url=https://www.arclaw.org/wp-content/uploads/Kennedy-Embodiment-and-Restoration-IJMH-2015.pdf | |||
|DOI=10.3149/jmh.1401.38 | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|accessdate=2026-03-13 | |||
}}</ref> The practice of epispasm seems to have persisted from the Second Century B. C. to the Sixth Century A. D.<ref name="hall1991">{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Hall | |last=Hall | ||
|first=Robert | |first=Robert | ||
| Line 33: | Line 52: | ||
Hodges (2001) reported, ''Lipodermos'' is the name given by the Greeks to the condition of having a deficient [[foreskin]]. According to Hodges: | Hodges (2001) reported, ''Lipodermos'' is the name given by the Greeks to the condition of having a deficient [[foreskin]]. According to Hodges: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
Through the development of the concept of ''lipodermos'', Greek medicine gave to Greek civilization a scientific reinforcement of its disapproval of the violations of [[genital integrity]] occurring in the Near East. This ethos posited not only that a circumcised penis is a deviation from the | Through the development of the concept of ''lipodermos'', Greek medicine gave to Greek civilization a scientific reinforcement of its disapproval of the violations of [[genital integrity]] occurring in the Near East. This ethos posited not only that a [[circumcised]] [[penis]] is a deviation from the natural — although that is of real importance — but that a [[circumcised]] penis is a defective and disfigured [[penis]], one that can be repaired by medical treatment. Medicine and law thereby entered into a mutually supportive relationship: [[circumcision]] was against the law because it mutilated its victims, but, taken to the next logical level in this medico-ethical argument, it was also against the law because it necessarily inflicted a state of ''lipodermos'' on its victims.<ref name="hodges2001">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Hodges | |last=Hodges | ||
|first=Frederick M. | |first=Frederick M. | ||
| Line 59: | Line 78: | ||
==Ancient surgical epispasm== | ==Ancient surgical epispasm== | ||
Hall reported that surgery was necessary for epispasm | Hall reported that surgery was necessary for epispasm,<ref name="hall1991" /> however that is not correct. | ||
==Ancient tissue expansion for epispasm== | ==Ancient tissue expansion for epispasm== | ||
| Line 106: | Line 125: | ||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
* [[Aulus Cornelius Celsus]] | |||
* [[Foreskin restoration]] | * [[Foreskin restoration]] | ||
* [[Foreskin restoration information for circumcised teens]] | |||
* [[Long foreskins]] | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
[[Category:Education]] | [[Category:Education]] | ||
[[Category:Greece]] | |||
[[Category:History]] | [[Category:History]] | ||
[[Category:Foreskin restoration]] | [[Category:Foreskin restoration]] | ||
[[Category:Judaism]] | [[Category:Judaism]] | ||
[[Category:Physiology]] | [[Category:Physiology]] | ||
[[de:Epispasmus]] | |||