Richard L. Miller: Difference between revisions

Add text and citation.
 
(2 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 18: Line 18:
  |issue=3
  |issue=3
  |pages=309-11
  |pages=309-11
  |url=
  |url=https://oce.ovid.com/journals/smeda/197003000/00007611-197003000-00014
  |archived=
  |archived=
  |quote=
  |quote=
Line 25: Line 25:
  |DOI=10.1097/00007611-197003000-00014  
  |DOI=10.1097/00007611-197003000-00014  
  |accessdate=2024-05-01
  |accessdate=2024-05-01
}}</ref> The American Academy of Pediatrics (1971) declared, "There are no valid medical indications for circumcision in the neonatal period."<ref name="aap1971">{{REFbook
}}</ref> The [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] (1971) declared, "There are no valid medical indications for circumcision in the neonatal period."<ref name="aap1971">{{REFbook
  |last=Committee on Fetus and Newborn
  |last=Committee on Fetus and Newborn
|first=
|init=
  |year=1971
  |year=1971
  |title=Standards and Recommendation for Hospital Care of Newborn infants. 5th ed.  
  |title=Standards and Recommendation for Hospital Care of Newborn infants. 5th ed.  
  |url=https://www.cirp.org/library/statements/aap/#a1971
  |url=https://www.cirp.org/library/statements/aap/#a1971
|scope=
  |location=Evanston, IL.
  |location=Evanston, IL.
  |publisher=American Academy of Pediatrics
  |publisher=American Academy of Pediatrics
|ISBN=
  |accessdate=2024-05-01
  |accessdate=2024-05-01
  }}</ref>
  }}</ref>
Immediate circumcision of the newborn is not a current practice in the [[United States]]. Circumcision of boys is losing popularity and is being replaced by [[intactness]].


{{PUB}}
{{PUB}}