Brussels Collaboration on Bodily Integrity: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add text and citation. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| (4 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 38: | Line 38: | ||
}}</ref> The groups argue that [[Circumcision| male]], [[Female circumcision| female]], and [[intersex]] cutting must be considered together.<ref name="brussels2019" /> | }}</ref> The groups argue that [[Circumcision| male]], [[Female circumcision| female]], and [[intersex]] cutting must be considered together.<ref name="brussels2019" /> | ||
The ethical question concerning cutting of children's genital organs is long-standing | The ethical question concerning cutting of children's genital organs is long-standing,<ref name="hill2003">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Hill | |last=Hill | ||
|first=George | |first=George | ||
| Line 57: | Line 57: | ||
|format=PDF | |format=PDF | ||
|accessdate=2024-08-31 | |accessdate=2024-08-31 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> but never has been satisfactorily resolved. | ||
Dr. Shimon Samuels, Director for International Relations for the Wiesenthal Center, in a letter to [[J. Steven Svoboda]] of [[Attorneys for the Rights of the Child]], expressed concern that the Brussels Collaboration threatened the [[Abrahamic covenant]], which has already been debunked by Professor [[Leonard Glick]],<ref>{{REFnews | Dr. Shimon Samuels, Director for International Relations for the Wiesenthal Center, in a letter to [[J. Steven Svoboda]] of [[Attorneys for the Rights of the Child]], expressed concern that the Brussels Collaboration threatened the [[Abrahamic covenant]], which has already been debunked by Professor [[Leonard Glick]],<ref>{{REFnews | ||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
}}</ref> however, he failed to acknowledge that boys born into Jewish families would be major beneficiaries of bodily integrity derived from the protection of their [[human rights]]. | }}</ref> however, he failed to acknowledge that boys born into Jewish families would be major beneficiaries of bodily integrity derived from the protection of their [[human rights]]. | ||
A second more detailed statement, published in August 2024, has 155 authors. | |||
{{PUB}} | {{PUB}} | ||
| Line 97: | Line 99: | ||
}} | }} | ||
* {{REFjournal | * {{REFjournal | ||
|last=The Brussels | |last=The Brussels Collaboration on Bodily integrity | ||
|first= | |first= | ||
|init= | |init= | ||
| Line 128: | Line 130: | ||
|accessdate=2024-08-30 | |accessdate=2024-08-30 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SEEALSO}} | |||
* [[Ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision]] | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
[[Category:Intactivism organization]] | [[Category:Intactivism organization]] | ||
[[Category:Human rights]] | [[Category:Human rights]] | ||
[[Category:Medical ethics]] | |||
[[Category:Intersex]] | [[Category:Intersex]] | ||
[[Category:Antisemitism]] | [[Category:Antisemitism]] | ||