Difference between revisions of "Mohammad Siddiqui"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m |
m (formattings) |
||
| (5 intermediate revisions by one other user not shown) | |||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
==Precedent== | ==Precedent== | ||
In an important precedent, Judge Sir James Mumby (2015) ruled that male [[circumcision]] is [[MGM| male genital mutilation]] and causes "significant harm."<ref>Re B and G (children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3.</ref> | In an important precedent, Judge Sir James Mumby (2015) ruled that male [[circumcision]] is [[MGM| male genital mutilation]] and causes "significant harm."<ref>Re B and G (children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3.</ref> | ||
| + | |||
| + | Law professor Kai Möller has also reviewed this case.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
| + | |last=Möller | ||
| + | |first=Kai | ||
| + | |init=K | ||
| + | |author-link= | ||
| + | |title=Male and Female Genital Cutting: Between the Best Interest of the Child and Genital Mutilation | ||
| + | |journal=Oxford Journal of Legal Studies | ||
| + | |date=2020-06-26 | ||
| + | |volume= | ||
| + | |issue= | ||
| + | |pages= | ||
| + | |url=https://academic.oup.com/ojls/advance-article/doi/10.1093/ojls/gqaa001/5862902 | ||
| + | |DOI=10.1093/ojls/gqaa001 | ||
| + | |accessdate=2024-11-08 | ||
| + | }}</ref> | ||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
* [[Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3]] | * [[Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3]] | ||
* [[United Kingdom]] | * [[United Kingdom]] | ||
| + | |||
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||
* {{REFweb | * {{REFweb | ||
| Line 88: | Line 105: | ||
|quote=National Secular Society spokesperson Dr Alejandro Sanchez said: "The excruciating details of Siddiqui's crimes once again lay bare the dangers inherent to ritual circumcision. | |quote=National Secular Society spokesperson Dr Alejandro Sanchez said: "The excruciating details of Siddiqui's crimes once again lay bare the dangers inherent to ritual circumcision. | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||
| − | |||
{{DEFAULTSORT:Siddiqui, Mohammad}} | {{DEFAULTSORT:Siddiqui, Mohammad}} | ||
| − | |||
[[Category:Person]] | [[Category:Person]] | ||
[[Category:Male]] | [[Category:Male]] | ||
| + | |||
[[Category:Physician]] | [[Category:Physician]] | ||
[[Category:Circumcision]] | [[Category:Circumcision]] | ||
[[Category:Muslim]] | [[Category:Muslim]] | ||
| + | [[Category:Criminal circumcision]] | ||
[[Category:UK]] | [[Category:UK]] | ||
Latest revision as of 14:39, 11 November 2024
Dr Mohammad Siddiqui (born 15 February 1966) is a former British medical doctor who was struck off the Medical Register in November 2013 for performing circumcision on boys in "dirty and unsafe conditions."[1] [2]
Siddiqui had no adequate means of anaesthesia, so he caused his victims extreme pain.[2]
Although he lost his license to practise medicine, he continued to perform non-therapeutic circumcision on young boys.
Contents
Application of criminal law to male circumcision
The Crown Prosecution Service brought 25 circumcision-related criminal charges against Siddiqui.[3]
"Siddiqui of Anchor Crescent, Birmingham, admitted twelve counts of assault occasioning actual bodily harm, eight counts of wrongly administrating a prescription only medicine, and five counts of cruelty to a person under sixteen." The charges relate to 21 boys and date between 5 April 2014 and 31 January 2019.[2]
Sidiqui is alleged to have used a "rusty medical tool" and the Circumstraint infant immobiliser device that is considered unacceptable in practice by the National Health Service.[4]
Sidiqui will be sentenced by Judge Noel Lucas of Southwark Crown Court on 14 January 2025.[2]
Religion apparently did not constitute a defence.
Precedent
In an important precedent, Judge Sir James Mumby (2015) ruled that male circumcision is male genital mutilation and causes "significant harm."[5]
Law professor Kai Möller has also reviewed this case.[6]
See also
External links
(31 October 2024). Ex-doctor pleads guilty to ritual circumcision child cruelty
, National Secular Society. Retrieved 1 November 2024.
Quote:National Secular Society spokesperson Dr Alejandro Sanchez said: "The excruciating details of Siddiqui's crimes once again lay bare the dangers inherent to ritual circumcision.
References
- ↑
Keogh, Glenn (26 February 2015)."Doctor struck off after performing 'botched and dirty' circumcisions on baby boys", Mirror. Retrieved 3 November 2024.
- ↑ a b c d Prosser, Ryan (29 October 2024)."Struck off doctor is facing jail for carrying out 'unsafe and unsanitary' mobile circumcisions for £250 a time that left young patients in agony", Daily Mail. Retrieved 1 November 2024.
- ↑ Anonymous (31 October 2024).
A former surgeon found guilty of causing harm during multiple male circumcision operations
, Crown Prosecution Service. Retrieved 1 November 2024.
Quote:He showed a complete disregard for the impact of his actions on his victims, families, and communities. We hope that this conviction offers some comfort in seeing Siddiqui being brought to justice.
- ↑ Evans, Holly (30 October 2024)."‘Cruel’ doctor used rusty medical tool and little pain relief to carry out mobile circumcisions", The Independent. Retrieved 1 November 2024.
- ↑ Re B and G (children) (No 2) [2015] EWFC 3.
- ↑
Möller K. Male and Female Genital Cutting: Between the Best Interest of the Child and Genital Mutilation. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies. 26 June 2020; DOI. Retrieved 8 November 2024.
