Intact Global: Difference between revisions

(3 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 164:

|date=2026-06-09

|accessdate=2026-06-17

}}</ref> <ref name="kelley2026">{{REFnews

</ref> <ref name="kelley2026">{{REFnews

|title=Lawsuit wants male circumcisions outlawed in Colorado

|url=https://www.westword.com/news/lawsuit-wants-male-circumcisions-outlawed-in-colorado-40897996/

Line 176:

|accessdate=2026-06-16

|quote=Intact Global has set its sights on stopping circumcision for years, and now the “intactivists” are ready to make the final cut in Colorado by banning it entirely.

}}</ref> <ref name="wingerter2026">{{REFnews

</ref> <ref name="wingerter2026">{{REFnews

|title=Lawsuit seeks to expand Colorado’s ban on female genital mutilation to also prohibit male circumcision

|url=https://www.denverpost.com/2026/06/10/colorado-circumcision-lawsuit-female-genital-mutilation-child-abuse/

Line 182:

|first=Meg

|init=

~~|author-link=~~

|publisher=Denver Post

|website=https://www.denverpost.com

|date=2026-05-16

|accessdate=2026-06-16

~~|format=~~

|quote=The plaintiffs said they experienced pain, scarring and lower sexual sensitivity, which they attributed to circumcision.

}}</ref>

Line 241:

Line 239:

* {{URLwebsite|https://www.intactglobal.org/|2024-08-16}}

}}

* {{REFjournal

|last=Povenmire

Line 254:

Line 251:

|pages=87-123

|accessdate=2025-05-04

}}

* {{REFjournal

|last=Bond

|init=SL

|author-link=https://www.lawyers.com/chicago/illinois/shea-lita-bond-2071633-a/

|url=https://repository.law.uic.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1579&context=lawreview

|title=State Laws Criminalizing Female Circumcision: A Violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

|journal=John Marshall Law Review

|date=1999

|volume=32

|issue=Winter

|pages=353-80

|accessdate=2026-08-06

}}

* {{REFdocument

Line 339:

Line 349:

|format=PDF

|date=2020

|accessdate=2025-04-01

|accessdate=2025-04-01}}

* {{REFweb

~~|url=http://www.savingsons.org/2015/07/circumcision-and-united-states.html~~

~~|title=Circumcision and The United States Constitution: Forced Genital Cutting of Minors is Illegal~~

~~|last=Day~~

~~|first=~~

~~|init=D~~

~~|author-link=~~

~~|publisher=Saving Our Sons~~

~~|date=2014~~

~~|accessdate=2025-10-18~~

}}

* {{REFnews

|title=Lawyers say Oregon genital cutting law discriminates against boys; seek circumcision ban

Line 397:

Line 395:

|accessdate=2026-04-30

|quote=At issue is whether gender-specific protections against genital cutting can withstand constitutional scrutiny in an era of increasing legal and ethical focus on bodily autonomy.

}}

* {{REFweb

|url=https://www.galdef.org/2026/07/25/intact-global-files-colorado-equal-protection-legal-challenge/

|title=Intact Global files Colorado Equal Protection Legal Challenge

|last=Thompson

|first=Troy

|publisher=GALDEF

|date=2026-07-25

|accessdate=2026-08-05

}}

@@ Line 164: / Line 164: @@
   |date=2026-06-09
   |accessdate=2026-06-17
-}}</ref> <ref name="kelley2026">{{REFnews
+</ref>  <ref name="kelley2026">{{REFnews
   |title=Lawsuit wants male circumcisions outlawed in Colorado
   |url=https://www.westword.com/news/lawsuit-wants-male-circumcisions-outlawed-in-colorado-40897996/
@@ Line 176: / Line 176: @@
   |accessdate=2026-06-16
   |quote=Intact Global has set its sights on stopping circumcision for years, and now the “intactivists” are ready to make the final cut in Colorado by banning it entirely.
-}}</ref> <ref name="wingerter2026">{{REFnews
+</ref> <ref name="wingerter2026">{{REFnews
   |title=Lawsuit seeks to expand Colorado’s ban on female genital mutilation to also prohibit male circumcision
   |url=https://www.denverpost.com/2026/06/10/colorado-circumcision-lawsuit-female-genital-mutilation-child-abuse/
@@ Line 182: / Line 182: @@
   |first=Meg
   |init=
- |author-link=
   |publisher=Denver Post
   |website=https://www.denverpost.com
   |date=2026-05-16
   |accessdate=2026-06-16
- |format=
   |quote=The plaintiffs said they experienced pain, scarring and lower sexual sensitivity, which they attributed to circumcision.
 }}</ref>
@@ Line 241: / Line 239: @@
 {{LINKS}}
 * {{URLwebsite|https://www.intactglobal.org/|2024-08-16}}
-}}
 * {{REFjournal
   |last=Povenmire
@@ Line 254: / Line 251: @@
   |pages=87-123
   |accessdate=2025-05-04
+}}
+* {{REFjournal
+ |last=Bond
+ |init=SL
+ |author-link=https://www.lawyers.com/chicago/illinois/shea-lita-bond-2071633-a/
+ |url=https://repository.law.uic.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1579&context=lawreview
+ |title=State Laws Criminalizing Female Circumcision: A Violation of the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment
+ |journal=John Marshall Law Review
+ |date=1999
+ |volume=32
+ |issue=Winter
+ |pages=353-80
+ |accessdate=2026-08-06
 }}
 * {{REFdocument
@@ Line 339: / Line 349: @@
   |format=PDF
   |date=2020
-  |accessdate=2025-04-01
+  |accessdate=2025-04-01}}
-* {{REFweb
- |url=http://www.savingsons.org/2015/07/circumcision-and-united-states.html
- |title=Circumcision and The United States Constitution: Forced Genital Cutting of Minors is Illegal
- |last=Day
- |first=
- |init=D
- |author-link=
- |publisher=Saving Our Sons
- |date=2014
- |accessdate=2025-10-18
-}}
 * {{REFnews
   |title=Lawyers say Oregon genital cutting law discriminates against boys; seek circumcision ban
@@ Line 397: / Line 395: @@
   |accessdate=2026-04-30
   |quote=At issue is whether gender-specific protections against genital cutting can withstand constitutional scrutiny in an era of increasing legal and ethical focus on bodily autonomy.
+}}
+* {{REFweb
+ |url=https://www.galdef.org/2026/07/25/intact-global-files-colorado-equal-protection-legal-challenge/
+ |title=Intact Global files Colorado Equal Protection Legal Challenge
+ |last=Thompson
+ |first=Troy
+ |publisher=GALDEF
+ |date=2026-07-25
+ |accessdate=2026-08-05
 }}
 {{REF}}