Holm Putzke: Difference between revisions

Line 39:

}}</ref> of the District Court of Cologne which classified a male [[circumcision]] for religious reasons as unlawful assault.

The German Bundestag did not follow Putzke's argument and decided on [[2012-12-12|12 December 2012]] after a controversial debate with 434 to 100 votes with 46 abstentions, to enforce a law that allows boy's [[circumcision]] under certain conditions. Putzke estimated the law is unconstitutional and accused the Bundestag to ~~habe~~ created 'legal nonsense', e.g. as far as the [[Mohel clause|purpose clause]] is concerned.

The German Bundestag did not follow Putzke's argument and decided on [[2012-12-12|12 December 2012]] after a controversial debate with 434 to 100 votes with 46 abstentions, to enforce a law that allows boy's [[circumcision]] under certain conditions. Putzke estimated the law is unconstitutional and accused the Bundestag to have created 'legal nonsense', e.g. as far as the [[Mohel clause|purpose clause]] is concerned.

(Source: [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holm_Putzke Wikipedia])

* [[Literature]]

Line 57:

Line 58:

[[Category:Author]]

[[Category:Intactivist of the month]]

[[Category:Germany]]

[[Category:Legal_scholar]]

[[de:Holm Putzke]]

@@ Line 39: / Line 39: @@
 }}</ref> of the District Court of Cologne which classified a male [[circumcision]] for religious reasons as unlawful assault.
-The German Bundestag did not follow Putzke's argument and decided on [[2012-12-12|12 December 2012]] after a controversial debate with 434 to 100 votes with 46 abstentions, to enforce a law that allows boy's [[circumcision]] under certain conditions. Putzke estimated the law is unconstitutional and accused the Bundestag to habe created 'legal nonsense', e.g. as far as the [[Mohel clause|purpose clause]] is concerned.
+The German Bundestag did not follow Putzke's argument and decided on [[2012-12-12|12 December 2012]] after a controversial debate with 434 to 100 votes with 46 abstentions, to enforce a law that allows boy's [[circumcision]] under certain conditions. Putzke estimated the law is unconstitutional and accused the Bundestag to have created 'legal nonsense', e.g. as far as the [[Mohel clause|purpose clause]] is concerned.
 (Source: [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holm_Putzke Wikipedia])
 {{SEEALSO}}
 * [[Literature]]
@@ Line 57: / Line 58: @@
 [[Category:Author]]
 [[Category:Intactivist of the month]]
+[[Category:Germany]]
+[[Category:Legal_scholar]]
 [[de:Holm Putzke]]