Canada: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m Install reference. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) m Relocate citation |
||
| Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
[[Douglas Gairdner]],s classic 1949 paper, ''The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision'', | [[Douglas Gairdner]],s classic 1949 paper, ''The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision'',<ref name="gairdner1949">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Gairdner | |last=Gairdner | ||
|first=D.M. | |first=D.M. | ||
| Line 54: | Line 54: | ||
|date=1949 | |date=1949 | ||
|accessdate=2019-10-28 | |accessdate=2019-10-28 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> seems to have been ignored in Canada. | ||
Patel (1966) reported his findings on neonatal [[circumcision]] in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Patel reported on the complications experienced in a series of 100 consecutive male infants. He also reported on the incidence of circumcision at [http://www.kingstonhsc.ca/ Kingston General Hospital] in Kingston, Ontario. Patel reported an incidence of circumcision of 48 percent. This is for one hospital in Kingston, ON but has been widely and falsely cited as the rate for all Canada.<ref>{{REFjournal | Patel (1966) reported his findings on neonatal [[circumcision]] in Kingston, Ontario, Canada. Patel reported on the complications experienced in a series of 100 consecutive male infants. He also reported on the incidence of circumcision at [http://www.kingstonhsc.ca/ Kingston General Hospital] in Kingston, Ontario. Patel reported an incidence of circumcision of 48 percent. This is for one hospital in Kingston, ON but has been widely and falsely cited as the rate for all Canada.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||