Michael Brady: Difference between revisions
m add image description |
mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
|Title= | |Title= | ||
|Text=There’s enough medical evidence to suggest we shouldn’t have been neutral before. Now, we’re clearly stating that third-party payers and Medicaid should cover circumcision so that parents aren’t having the decision made for them. | |Text=There’s enough medical evidence to suggest we shouldn’t have been neutral before. Now, we’re clearly stating that third-party payers and Medicaid should cover circumcision so that parents aren’t having the decision made for them. | ||
|Author= | |Author=Michael Brady | ||
|Source= | |Source=The Daily Beast | ||
|ref=<ref name="DailyBeast"> | |ref=<ref name="DailyBeast">{{REFweb | ||
|url=http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2012/08/27/american-academy-of-pediatrics-circumcise-me-baby.html | |||
|title=The Daily Beast, American Academy of Pediatrics: Circumcise It! | |||
|first=Lizzie | |||
|last=Crocker | |||
|date=2012-08-27 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 49: | Line 55: | ||
|Title= | |Title= | ||
|Text=Even if we weren’t going to routinely recommend circumcision, we could tell parents the risks and benefits and be confident that we weren’t subjecting their child to a lifelong change he would be uncomfortable with. | |Text=Even if we weren’t going to routinely recommend circumcision, we could tell parents the risks and benefits and be confident that we weren’t subjecting their child to a lifelong change he would be uncomfortable with. | ||
|Author= | |Author=Michael Brady | ||
|Source= | |Source=The Daily Beast | ||
|ref=<ref name="DailyBeast"/> | |ref=<ref name="DailyBeast"/> | ||
}} | }} | ||
| Line 64: | Line 70: | ||
[[Category:From CircLeaks]] | [[Category:From CircLeaks]] | ||
[[Category:From IntactWiki]] | [[Category:From IntactWiki]] | ||
[[de:{{FULLPAGENAME}}]] | |||