Difference between revisions of "Indiana - Wrongful circumcision"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add text. Remove Construction Site template.) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | In a 2003 '''Indiana wrongful circumcision''' case, the jury found that no harm was done to the boy so no damages were awarded. | |
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||
| − | * http://www.onpointnews.com/NEWS/Jury-Finds-No-Harm-to-Boy-From-Wrongful-Circumcision.html | + | |
| + | * [http://www.onpointnews.com/NEWS/Jury-Finds-No-Harm-to-Boy-From-Wrongful-Circumcision.html Jury finds no harm to boy] | ||
<!-- {{REF}} --> | <!-- {{REF}} --> | ||
Revision as of 02:33, 5 July 2020
In a 2003 Indiana wrongful circumcision case, the jury found that no harm was done to the boy so no damages were awarded.