Position statements on infant circumcision: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Netherlands: Add sub-section. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Canada: Add sub-sections. |
||
| Line 240: | Line 240: | ||
== Canada == | == Canada == | ||
===College of Physicians and Surgeons of British Columbia=== | |||
{{Citation | {{Citation | ||
|Text=Current understanding of the benefits, risks and potential harm of this procedure no longer supports this practice for prophylactic health benefit. Routine infant male circumcision performed on a healthy infant is now considered a non-therapeutic and medically unnecessary intervention. | |Text=Current understanding of the benefits, risks and potential harm of this procedure no longer supports this practice for prophylactic health benefit. Routine infant male circumcision performed on a healthy infant is now considered a non-therapeutic and medically unnecessary intervention. | ||
| Line 246: | Line 246: | ||
|Source= | |Source= | ||
}} | }} | ||
===Canadian Paediatric Society=== | |||
The [https://www.cps.ca/ Canadian Paediatric Society] (1996) stated: | The [https://www.cps.ca/ Canadian Paediatric Society] (1996) stated: | ||
| Line 265: | Line 267: | ||
|accessdate=2020-06-25 | |accessdate=2020-06-25 | ||
}}</ref></blockquote> | }}</ref></blockquote> | ||
===Canadian Urological Association=== | |||
The [http://www.cua.org/en Canadian Urological Association] issued its statement on circumcision in February 2018. | The [http://www.cua.org/en Canadian Urological Association] issued its statement on circumcision in February 2018. | ||