Position statements on infant circumcision: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →The trade associations pact: Wikify ACOG. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Canadian Paediatric Society: Add text and links. |
||
| Line 248: | Line 248: | ||
===Canadian Paediatric Society=== | ===Canadian Paediatric Society=== | ||
The [[Canadian Paediatric Society]] has issued three statements on non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision. Not one supports the practice. | |||
====1975==== | |||
The Canadian Paediatric Society (CPS) took a position against non-therapeutic circumcision of boys in 1975, declaring it to have "no medical indication" and to be an "obsolete operation".<ref name="cps1975">{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Swyer | |||
|first=P.R. | |||
|author-link= | |||
|last2=Boston | |||
|first2=R.W. | |||
|author2-link= | |||
|last3=Murdock | |||
|first3=A. | |||
|author3-link= | |||
|last4=Paré | |||
|first4=C. | |||
|author4-link= | |||
|last5=Rees | |||
|first5=E. | |||
|author5-link= | |||
|last6=Segal | |||
|first6=S. | |||
|author6-link= | |||
|last7=Sinclair | |||
|first7=J.C. | |||
|author7-link= | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=FN 75 Circumcision in the newborn period | |||
|journal=CPS News Bull Suppl | |||
|location= | |||
|date=1975 | |||
|volume=8 | |||
|issue=2 | |||
|pages=1-2 | |||
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/statements/cps1975/ | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID= | |||
|pubmedCID= | |||
|DOI= | |||
|accessdate=2020-06-27 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
====1996==== | |||
The [https://www.cps.ca/ Canadian Paediatric Society] (1996) stated: | The [https://www.cps.ca/ Canadian Paediatric Society] (1996) stated: | ||
| Line 267: | Line 310: | ||
|accessdate=2020-06-25 | |accessdate=2020-06-25 | ||
}}</ref></blockquote> | }}</ref></blockquote> | ||
====2015==== | |||
The CPS again considered non-therapeutic infant circumcision in 2015. The CPS stated: | |||
<blockquote>While there may be a benefit for some boys in high-risk populations and circumstances where the procedure could be considered for disease reduction or treatment, the Canadian Paediatric Society does not recommend the routine circumcision of every newborn male.<ref name="cps2015">{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Sorokin | |||
|first=S. Todd | |||
|author-link= | |||
|last2=Finlay | |||
|first2=J.C. | |||
|author2-link= | |||
|last3=Jeffries | |||
|first3=A.L. | |||
|author3-link= | |||
|etal=yes | |||
|title=Newborn male circumcision | |||
|journal=Paediatr Child Health | |||
|location= | |||
|date=2015-08 | |||
|volume=20 | |||
|issue=6 | |||
|pages=311-20 | |||
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4578472/ | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID=26435672 | |||
|pubmedCID=4578472 | |||
|DOI=10.1093/pch/20.6.311 | |||
|accessdate=2020-06-27 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
</blockquote> | |||
===Canadian Urological Association=== | ===Canadian Urological Association=== | ||