Circumcision study flaws: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Add text and link.
Line 14: Line 14:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Bossio ''et al''. (2014) conducted a comprehensive review of the circumcision literature. They reported that most research was concentrated on finding a benefit for non-therapeutic circumcision and there were large gaps in the knowledge of the sexual health correlates of male circumcision.
Bossio ''et al''. (2014) conducted a comprehensive review of the circumcision literature. They reported that most research was concentrated on finding a benefit for non-therapeutic circumcision and there were large gaps in the knowledge of the sexual health correlates of male circumcision, including:
* penile sensation
* sexual functioning
* effect on men's sexual partners and body image
* satisfaction with circumcision status
* factors that contribute to the decision to circumcise.<ref name="bossio2014">{{REFjournal
|last=Bossio
|first=Jennifer
|author-link=
|last2=Pukal
|first2=Caroline
|author2-link=
|last3=Steele
|first3=Stephan
|author3-link=
|etal=no
|title=A review of the current state of the male circumcision literature
|trans-title=
|language=English
|journal=J Sex Med
|location=
|date=2014
|volume=11
|issue=
|pages=2847-64
|url=
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=
|pubmedCID=
|DOI=10.1111/jsm.12703
|accessdate=2020-08-02
}}</ref>