Documented severe complications of circumcision: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →What the AAP says: Revise text. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Royal Dutch Medical Association: Change formatting. |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
== Royal Dutch Medical Association == | == Royal Dutch Medical Association == | ||
The Royal Dutch Medical Association states: "There is no convincing evidence that circumcision is useful or necessary in terms of prevention or hygiene. Partly in the light of the complications which can arise during or after circumcision, circumcision is not justifiable except on medical/therapeutic grounds." | The Royal Dutch Medical Association states: | ||
<blockquote> | |||
"There is no convincing evidence that circumcision is useful or necessary in terms of prevention or hygiene. Partly in the light of the complications which can arise during or after circumcision, circumcision is not justifiable except on medical/therapeutic grounds." | |||
"Contrary to what is often thought, circumcision entails the risk of medical and psychological complications." | "Contrary to what is often thought, circumcision entails the risk of medical and psychological complications." | ||
| Line 58: | Line 60: | ||
|date=2010 | |date=2010 | ||
|accessdate=2012-11-23 | |accessdate=2012-11-23 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref></blockquote> | ||
== [[NOHARMM]] == | == [[NOHARMM]] == | ||