Difference between revisions of "Female circumcision in America"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
m (adjusted REFjournal) |
m (wikify W.G. Rathmann) |
||
| Line 93: | Line 93: | ||
|last=Rathmann | |last=Rathmann | ||
|init=WG | |init=WG | ||
| + | |author-link=W.G. Rathmann | ||
|title=Female Circumcision, Indications and a New Technique | |title=Female Circumcision, Indications and a New Technique | ||
|journal=General Practioner | |journal=General Practioner | ||
Revision as of 08:59, 11 October 2021
America has a long and dark history regarding both male and female circumcision. This 2 part video series will cover the history of female circumcision in America.
References
Morris RT. Is evolution trying to do away with the clitoris?. American Association of OB/GYNs. 1892; 4- McFarland TS. Circumcision of Girls. Journal of Orificial Surgery. July 1898; 7: 32-33.
- Dawson BE. Circumcision in the Female. American Journal of Clinical Medicine. June 1915; 22(6): 520-523.
- Eskridge BC. Why not circumcise the girl as well as the boy?. Texas State Journal of Medicine. May 1918; 14: 17-19.
- McDonald CF. Circumcision of the Female. General Practioner. September 1958; XVIII
- Rathmann WG. Female Circumcision, Indications and a New Technique. General Practioner. September 1959;
