Douglas Gairdner: Difference between revisions
m added STANDARDWORK, using the template |
m using real template |
||
| Line 121: | Line 121: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Gairdner's 1949 article, ''The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision'',<ref name="fate1949">{{ | Gairdner's 1949 article, ''The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision'',<ref name="fate1949">{{GairdnerDM1949}}</ref> was described as "a model of perceptive and pungent writing."<ref name="spence" /> It concluded that if circumcision became uncommon it would result in "the saving of about 16 children's lives lost from circumcision each year in this country..."<ref name="fate1949"/> According to Wallerstein, the article "began to affect the practice of circumcision by the British".<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Wallerstein | |last=Wallerstein | ||
|init=E | |init=E | ||