Genital cutting in Christianity: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add SEEALSO link; Revise text. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''Genital cutting in Christianity''' was rejected by the Church Fathers at the [[Council at Jerusalem]] which was held | '''Genital cutting in Christianity''' was rejected by the Church Fathers at the [[Council at Jerusalem]] which was held in or about 49 A.D. | ||
[[Circumcision]] is | [[Circumcision]] is believed to be a good "Christian value" by a ''few'' Christians in different parts of the world, including the United States, South Korea, Africa and the Philippines. Christian advocates of male infant circumcision often cite the alleged [[Abrahamic covenant|covenant between god and Abraham]] as outlined in the book of Genesis (e.g., the Old Testament), or believe that since the men of the Old Testament were circumcised, that it must be a good Christian value. Still others acknowledge that male infant circumcision was outlined to Abraham and his descendants, and that gentiles were excluded, but believe the New Testament says it's just a matter of preference, and that gentiles could choose to be circumcised or not, or could choose to have their children circumcised or allowed to be intact. These are erroneous views. | ||
== Circumcision and coercing others to be circumcised == | == Circumcision and coercing others to be circumcised == | ||
| Line 99: | Line 99: | ||
* [[Council at Jerusalem]] | * [[Council at Jerusalem]] | ||
* [[Catholics Against Circumcision]] | * [[Catholics Against Circumcision]] | ||
* [[Whole Christian]] | |||
{{LINKS}} | {{LINKS}} | ||