American Academy of Pediatrics: Difference between revisions
m added Category:Lawsuit |
m using Template:MD; using Template:MPH |
||
| Line 114: | Line 114: | ||
===Fourth policy (1999)=== | ===Fourth policy (1999)=== | ||
The American Academy of Pediatrics had been acutely embarrassed by the faults of [[Edgar J. Schoen| Edgar Schoen]]'s horrific circumcision policy statement, so a new task force was convened under the direction of Carole Marie Lannon, MD, MPH, to produce a new, more appropriate, and less embarrassing policy statement on non-therapeutic child circumcision. | The American Academy of Pediatrics had been acutely embarrassed by the faults of [[Edgar J. Schoen| Edgar Schoen]]'s horrific circumcision policy statement, so a new task force was convened under the direction of Carole Marie Lannon, {{MD}}, {{MPH}}, to produce a new, more appropriate, and less embarrassing policy statement on non-therapeutic child circumcision. | ||
The AAP asserted in their 1999 Circumcision Policy Statement that parents have a right to decide to circumcise their children based on cultural or religious factors (although they removed any mention of esthetics as a possible parental motivation, despite previous inclusion in their 1989 statement). No further substantiation of this right was offered. Whether or not a medical benefit was required for parents to make this choice was also not addressed. <br> | The AAP asserted in their 1999 Circumcision Policy Statement that parents have a right to decide to circumcise their children based on cultural or religious factors (although they removed any mention of esthetics as a possible parental motivation, despite previous inclusion in their 1989 statement). No further substantiation of this right was offered. Whether or not a medical benefit was required for parents to make this choice was also not addressed. <br> | ||
| Line 202: | Line 202: | ||
The AAP allied itself with the [[American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists| American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] (ACOG) and the [[American Academy of Family Physicians]] (AAFP) to produce a new circumcision policy that would claim a medical benefit. A new task force was named with [[Susan Blank]], a doctor with pro-circumcision credentials as chairwoman. The task force was an unusually large eight-member task force with an unusual constitution. It included: | The AAP allied itself with the [[American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists| American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] (ACOG) and the [[American Academy of Family Physicians]] (AAFP) to produce a new circumcision policy that would claim a medical benefit. A new task force was named with [[Susan Blank]], a doctor with pro-circumcision credentials as chairwoman. The task force was an unusually large eight-member task force with an unusual constitution. It included: | ||
* Ellen Buerk, MD, representing the board of directors of the AAP. | * Ellen Buerk, {{MD}}, representing the board of directors of the AAP. | ||
* [[Michael Brady]], MD, a HIV specialist with pro-circumcision views. | * [[Michael Brady]], {{MD}}, a HIV specialist with pro-circumcision views. | ||
* Waldemar Carlo, MD, a specialist in the care of the newborn. | * Waldemar Carlo, {{MD}}, a specialist in the care of the newborn. | ||
* [[Andrew Freedman]], a Jewish urologist from Los Angeles who circumcised his own son on the kitchen table. | * [[Andrew Freedman]], a Jewish urologist from Los Angeles who circumcised his own son on the kitchen table. | ||
* [[Douglas Diekema]], a pediatric medical ethicist. | * [[Douglas Diekema]], a pediatric medical ethicist. | ||
* Lynne Maxwell, MD, a pain control specialist. | * Lynne Maxwell, {{MD}}, a pain control specialist. | ||
* Steven Wegner, MD, JD, a medical insurance specialist, who evidently was appointed to the task force to preserve and protect [[third-party payment]]. | * Steven Wegner, {{MD}}, JD, a medical insurance specialist, who evidently was appointed to the task force to preserve and protect [[third-party payment]]. | ||
The addition of a member to represent the board of directors and an insurance specialist was most unusual and illustrates the importance that the administration of the AAP placed on preservation and protection of [[third-party payment]]. | The addition of a member to represent the board of directors and an insurance specialist was most unusual and illustrates the importance that the administration of the AAP placed on preservation and protection of [[third-party payment]]. | ||
| Line 214: | Line 214: | ||
The task force also included representatives from other pro-circumcision organizations: | The task force also included representatives from other pro-circumcision organizations: | ||
* Charles LeBaron, MD, representing the [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]], where [[Bias| biased]] doctors had been working to produce a pro-circumcision policy since 2008. | * Charles LeBaron, {{MD}}, representing the [[Centers for Disease Control and Prevention]], where [[Bias| biased]] doctors had been working to produce a pro-circumcision policy since 2008. | ||
* Sabrina Craigo, MD, representing the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, whose fellows make extra money by performing non-therapeutic circumcisions on newborn baby boys. | * Sabrina Craigo, {{MD}}, representing the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, whose fellows make extra money by performing non-therapeutic circumcisions on newborn baby boys. | ||
* Lesley Atwood, MD, representing the [[American Academy of Family Physicians]]. whose fellows also make extra money by performing non-therapeutic circumcision. | * Lesley Atwood, {{MD}}, representing the [[American Academy of Family Physicians]]. whose fellows also make extra money by performing non-therapeutic circumcision. | ||
====Discussion==== | ====Discussion==== | ||