James Heilman: Difference between revisions

Line 19:

|quote=Medical doctors in Australia, Canada, and the United States practiced circumcision in the twentieth century, so these nations have a heavy proportion of circumcised men, some of whom become medical doctors. These circumcised male doctors share the same bias in favor of male circumcision as do other circumcised males.7,31,43_Male doctors who were circumcised as infants are more likely to recommend circumcision of infants to parents.

}}</ref>

[[Canada]] has turned away from its former practice of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision. Medical societies call it obsolete, non-therapeutic and unnecessary. The Health Insurance Plans (HIPs) have not paid for non-therapeutic circumcision for decades, and most hospital no longer provide it. The incidence of non-therapeutic circumcision in Canada has sharply declined, nevertheless, Heilman appears to continue to support non-therapeutic circumcision.

==Wikipedia==

Line 50:

Line 53:

Heilman has taken over the editing of articles relating to male [[circumcision]]. In this role, he now occupies the position formerly held by [[Jake H. Waskett]] and displays a similar circumcision [[bias]]. An examination of the circumcision related articles edited by Heilman, would lead one to believe that he has become an disciple of [[Brian J. Morris]] and his associates.

Strangely, Heilman, who lacks a [[foreskin]], relies on such men as Brian J. Morris and [[John N. Krieger]], who also lack a foreskin, for information on the nature of the sensation from the foreskin.

Strangely, Heilman, who apparently lacks a [[foreskin]], relies on such men as Brian J. Morris and [[John N. Krieger]], who also lack a foreskin, for information on the nature of the sensation from the foreskin.

Heilman (Doc James), has the power to get contributors who he does not like banned from Wikipedia, which he does not hesitate to use.<ref>{{REFweb

@@ Line 19: / Line 19: @@
   |quote=Medical doctors in Australia, Canada, and the United States practiced circumcision in the twentieth century, so these nations have a heavy proportion of circumcised men, some of whom become medical doctors. These circumcised male doctors share the same bias in favor of male circumcision as do other circumcised males.7,31,43_Male doctors who were circumcised as infants are more likely to recommend circumcision of infants to parents.
 }}</ref>
+[[Canada]] has turned away from its former practice of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision. Medical societies call it obsolete, non-therapeutic and unnecessary. The Health Insurance Plans (HIPs) have not paid for non-therapeutic circumcision for decades, and most hospital no longer provide it. The incidence of non-therapeutic circumcision in Canada has sharply declined, nevertheless, Heilman appears to continue to support non-therapeutic circumcision.
 ==Wikipedia==
@@ Line 50: / Line 53: @@
 Heilman has taken over the editing of articles relating to male [[circumcision]]. In this role, he now occupies the position formerly held by [[Jake H. Waskett]] and displays a similar circumcision [[bias]]. An examination of the circumcision related articles edited by Heilman, would lead one to believe that he has become an disciple of [[Brian J. Morris]] and his associates.
-Strangely, Heilman, who lacks a [[foreskin]], relies on such men as Brian J. Morris and [[John N. Krieger]], who also lack a foreskin, for information on the nature of the sensation from the foreskin.
+Strangely, Heilman, who apparently lacks a [[foreskin]], relies on such men as Brian J. Morris and [[John N. Krieger]], who also lack a foreskin, for information on the nature of the sensation from the foreskin.
 Heilman (Doc James), has the power to get contributors who he does not like banned from Wikipedia, which he does not hesitate to use.<ref>{{REFweb