United Kingdom: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Phimosis diagnosis issues: Add text and citation. |
||
| Line 519: | Line 519: | ||
|DOI=10.1136/bmj.306.6869.1 | |DOI=10.1136/bmj.306.6869.1 | ||
|accessdate=2021-09-05 | |accessdate=2021-09-05 | ||
}}</ref> Williams et al. (1993) complained that most of the 30,000 circumcisions that were being done in the UK were on boys under 15. They reported that of 69 boys referred by GPs, 29 had a healthy retractile foreskin, 30 had a healthy non-retractile foreskin, and only 9 had a phimosis requiring circumcision.<ref name="williams1993"> | }}</ref> Williams et al. (1993) complained that most of the 30,000 circumcisions that were being done in the UK were on boys under 15. They reported that of 69 boys referred by GPs, 29 had a healthy retractile foreskin, 30 had a healthy non-retractile foreskin, and only 9 had a phimosis requiring circumcision.<ref name="williams1993"> {{REFjournal | ||
|last=Williams | |||
</ref> | |first=Nigel | ||
|init= | |||
|author-link= | |||
|last2=Chell | |||
|first2=Julian | |||
|init2= | |||
|author2-link= | |||
|last3=Kapila | |||
|first3=Leela | |||
|init3= | |||
|author3-link= | |||
|etal=no | |||
|title=Why are children referred for circumcision? | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|journal=BMJ | |||
|location= | |||
|date=1993-01-02 | |||
|volume=306 | |||
|issue=6859 | |||
|article= | |||
|page=28 | |||
|pages= | |||
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/general/williams/ | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID=843557 | |||
|pubmedCID=1676352 | |||
|DOI=10.1136/bmj.306.6869.28 | |||
|accessdate=2021-09-05 | |||
}}</ref> | |||