United States of America: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Late twentieth century: Add text and citation. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Late twentieth century: Add text and citation. |
||
| Line 383: | Line 383: | ||
|url=https://www.arclaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/is-it-lawful-to-use-medicaid-to-pay-for-circumcision.pdf | |url=https://www.arclaw.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/is-it-lawful-to-use-medicaid-to-pay-for-circumcision.pdf | ||
|quote= | |quote= | ||
|accessdate=2021-10-05 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
California Medicaid (Medi-Cal) announced in 1968 that non-therapeutic circumcision would not be a covered benefit.<ref>{{REFweb | |||
|url=https://insuremekevin.com/california-health-plans-cover-new-born-circumcision/ | |||
|title=Medi-Cal won’t cover circumcision | |||
|last= | |||
|first= | |||
|accessdate=2021-10-05 | |accessdate=2021-10-05 | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
| Line 438: | Line 446: | ||
|accessdate=2021-10-05 | |accessdate=2021-10-05 | ||
}}</ref></blockquote> | }}</ref></blockquote> | ||
Preston's paper elicited a response from CJ Falliers, M.D. (1970) who cited the "sensory pleasure induced by tactile stimulation of the foreskin."<ref name="falliers1970">{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Falliers | |||
|first= | |||
|init=CJ | |||
|author-link= | |||
|etal= | |||
|title=Circumcision (letter) | |||
|trans-title= | |||
|language= | |||
|journal=JAMA | |||
|location= | |||
|date=1970-12-21 | |||
|volume=214 | |||
|issue=12 | |||
|article= | |||
|page=2194 | |||
|pages= | |||
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/general/falliers1/ | |||
|archived= | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID= | |||
|pubmedCID= | |||
|DOI= | |||
|accessdate=2021-10-05 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
The [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] (AAP) is not an "academy" at all. It is a medical trade association that protects and advances the business and financial interests of its pediatrician "fellows". Influenced by Preston's paper, the AAP published a manual on the hospital care of newborn infants in 1971. The manual included the statement: | The [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] (AAP) is not an "academy" at all. It is a medical trade association that protects and advances the business and financial interests of its pediatrician "fellows". Influenced by Preston's paper, the AAP published a manual on the hospital care of newborn infants in 1971. The manual included the statement: | ||