USAID: Difference between revisions

Revive text and add citations.
WikiAdmin (talk | contribs)
m wikify HIV
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Image:USAID.png|right|thumb|USAID]]
[[Image:USAID.png|right|thumb|USAID]]
In a February 2009 report produced by '''USAID''', a U.S. government agency, researchers found that circumcised men were more likely to have HIV in 10 of 18 (African) countries with data available.<ref name='CR22'>{{REFnews
In a February 2009 report produced by '''USAID''', a U.S. government agency, researchers found that circumcised men were more likely to have [[HIV]] in 10 of 18 (African) countries with data available.<ref name='CR22'>{{REFnews
  |last=USAID
  |last=USAID
  |first=
  |first=
Line 19: Line 19:
  |quote=Levels and spread of HIV seroprevalence and associated factors: Evidence from national household surveys
  |quote=Levels and spread of HIV seroprevalence and associated factors: Evidence from national household surveys
  |accessdate=2011-03-24
  |accessdate=2011-03-24
}}</ref> The report found condom use, not circumcision, to be correlated with HIV status. Despite this report, USAID is listed as a contributing partner and a sponsor for the "[[Clearinghouse on Male Circumcision]] for HIV Prevention."<ref>{{REFweb
}}</ref> The report found condom use, not circumcision, to be correlated with [[HIV]] status. Despite this report, USAID is listed as a contributing partner and a sponsor for the "[[Clearinghouse on Male Circumcision]] for [[HIV]] Prevention."<ref>{{REFweb
  |last=
  |last=
  |first=
  |first=
Line 80: Line 80:
== Accelerated Saturation Initiative ==
== Accelerated Saturation Initiative ==


In November 2010, USAID issued a "technical brief" on male circumcision as HIV prevention. In the report, USAID states that it is supporting Swaziland's "Accelerated Saturation Initiative" for circumcision by providing "implementation support together with the <small>[U.S.]</small> Department of Defense, the Peace Corps, and the U.S. [[Centers for Disease Control]] and Prevention (CDC)." The report goes on to say that USAID, along with [[UNAIDS]], is providing technical and financial assistance in the studying circumcision programs in 14 African countries.<ref>{{REFnews
In November 2010, USAID issued a "technical brief" on male circumcision as [[HIV]] prevention. In the report, USAID states that it is supporting Swaziland's "Accelerated Saturation Initiative" for circumcision by providing "implementation support together with the <small>[U.S.]</small> Department of Defense, the Peace Corps, and the U.S. [[Centers for Disease Control]] and Prevention (CDC)." The report goes on to say that USAID, along with [[UNAIDS]], is providing technical and financial assistance in the studying circumcision programs in 14 African countries.<ref>{{REFnews
  |last=
  |last=
  |first=
  |first=
Line 134: Line 134:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


One issue of C-Change's publication included a study measuring media coverage of circumcision as HIV prevention and strategies for keeping media reports positive.<ref name='C-Channel 2009-12'>{{REFweb
One issue of C-Change's publication included a study measuring media coverage of circumcision as [[HIV]] prevention and strategies for keeping media reports positive.<ref name='C-Channel 2009-12'>{{REFweb
  |quote=Print media reporting of male circumcision for preventing HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa
  |quote=Print media reporting of male circumcision for preventing HIV infection in sub-Saharan Africa
  |last=Wang Al a; Duke W b; Schmid GP b
  |last=Wang Al a; Duke W b; Schmid GP b
Line 161: Line 161:
{{Citation
{{Citation
  |Title=Levels and Spread of HIV Seroprevalence and Associated Factors: Evidence from National Household Surveys
  |Title=Levels and Spread of HIV Seroprevalence and Associated Factors: Evidence from National Household Surveys
  |Text=There appears no clear pattern of association between male circumcision and HIV prevalence—in 8 of 18 countries with data, HIV prevalence is lower among circumcised men, while in the remaining 10 countries it is higher.
  |Text=There appears no clear pattern of association between male circumcision and [[HIV]] prevalence—in 8 of 18 countries with data, [[HIV]] prevalence is lower among circumcised men, while in the remaining 10 countries it is higher.
  |Author=
  |Author=
  |Source=
  |Source=
Line 167: Line 167:
}}
}}


Two separate very-large-scale population based studies found no relationship between circumcision status and the risk of contracting HIV infection.
Two separate very-large-scale population based studies found no relationship between circumcision status and the risk of contracting [[HIV]] infection.


Mayan et al. (2021) carried out a massive empirical study of the male population of the province of Ontario, [[Canada]] (569,950 males), of whom 203,588 (35.7%) were circumcised between 1991 and 2017. The study concluded that circumcision status is not related to risk of HIV infection.<ref name="mayan2021">{{REFjournal
Mayan et al. (2021) carried out a massive empirical study of the male population of the province of Ontario, [[Canada]] (569,950 males), of whom 203,588 (35.7%) were circumcised between 1991 and 2017. The study concluded that circumcision status is not related to risk of [[HIV]] infection.<ref name="mayan2021">{{REFjournal
  |last=Mayan
  |last=Mayan
  |first=Madhur
  |first=Madhur
Line 211: Line 211:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


[[Morten Frisch]] and Jacob Simonsen (2021) carried out a large scale empirical population study in [[Denmark]] of 855,654 males regarding the alleged value of male circumcision in preventing HIV and other sexually transmitted infections in men. They found that circumcised men have a higher rate of STI and HIV infection overall than intact men.<ref name="frisch2021">{{REFjournal
[[Morten Frisch]] and Jacob Simonsen (2021) carried out a large scale empirical population study in [[Denmark]] of 855,654 males regarding the alleged value of male circumcision in preventing [[HIV]] and other sexually transmitted infections in men. They found that circumcised men have a higher rate of STI and [[HIV]] infection overall than intact men.<ref name="frisch2021">{{REFjournal
  |last=Frisch
  |last=Frisch
  |first=Morten
  |first=Morten
Line 241: Line 241:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


There now is credible evidence that the massive, expensive African circumcision programs have ''not'' been effective in preventing HIV infection.
There now is credible evidence that the massive, expensive African circumcision programs have ''not'' been effective in preventing [[HIV]] infection.


==Criticism==
==Criticism==
Line 266: Line 266:


{{LINKS}}
{{LINKS}}
* {{REFweb
* {{REFweb
  |url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/alleged-medical-benefits/hivaids/
  |url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/alleged-medical-benefits/hivaids/