Urinary tract infection: Difference between revisions
m using singular name for category |
m using UNI template |
||
| Line 179: | Line 179: | ||
|volume=100 | |volume=100 | ||
|page=580 (supplement) | |page=580 (supplement) | ||
}}</ref><ref>Saez-Llorens X. | }}</ref><ref name="Saez-Llorens 1989">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Saez-Llorens | |||
|init=X | |||
|last2=Umana | |||
|first2=Maria A. | |||
|ini2=MA | |||
|last3=Odio | |||
|first3=Carla M. | |||
|init3=CM | |||
|init4=Lohr | |||
|first4=Jacob A. | |||
|init4=JA | |||
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/disease/UTI/llorens/ | |||
|title=Bacterial contamination rates for non-clean-catch and clean-catch midstream urine collections in uncircumcised boys | |||
|publisher=Department of Pediatrics. Hospital Nacional de Ninos, San Jose, Costa Rica, and Department of Pediatrics, the Children's Medical Center of the {{UNI|University of Virginia|UVA}}, Charlottesville, {{USSC|VA}} | |||
|journal=J Pediatr | |||
|date=1989 | |||
|volume=114 | |||
|issue=1 | |||
|pages=93-5 | |||
}}</ref> McCracken recommends investigation with radiographic and/or sonography.<ref name="ginsburg uti"/> | |||
A recent study of mice indicates that p-fimbriated ''Escherichia Col''i, the organism responsible for about 85% of UTI, is capable of burrowing into the deeper tissue of the bladder<ref>{{REFjournal | A recent study of mice indicates that p-fimbriated ''Escherichia Col''i, the organism responsible for about 85% of UTI, is capable of burrowing into the deeper tissue of the bladder<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
| Line 488: | Line 508: | ||
|volume=149 | |volume=149 | ||
|pages=170-173 | |pages=170-173 | ||
}}</ref> There is a significant false-positive rate in diagnosing UTI when urine cultures alone are used.<ref name="Mueller 1997"/><ref | }}</ref> There is a significant false-positive rate in diagnosing UTI when urine cultures alone are used.<ref name="Mueller 1997"/><ref name="Saez-Llorens 1989"/> This criticism was addressed to some extent in Wiswell's second review.<ref name="Wiswell 1986"/> | ||
* The hospital chart data used in the retrospective studies are unreliable. Hospitals frequently omit to record a circumcision on a baby's chart. In Atlanta, O'Brien found that circumcision was recorded only 84.3% of the time for circumcised boys.<ref>{{REFjournal | * The hospital chart data used in the retrospective studies are unreliable. Hospitals frequently omit to record a circumcision on a baby's chart. In Atlanta, O'Brien found that circumcision was recorded only 84.3% of the time for circumcised boys.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||