American Academy of Pediatrics: Difference between revisions

Comment: Wikify.
Fifth policy (2012): Add citation.
Line 346: Line 346:
  |date=2007
  |date=2007
  |accessdate=2020-04-16
  |accessdate=2020-04-16
}}</ref> The AAP saw this as an opportunity to protect third-party payment for non-therapeutic circumcision.  
}}</ref> The AAP saw this as an opportunity to protect third-party payment for non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="jones2022">{{REFweb
|url=https://www.circumcisionisafraud.com/foia-request-sheds-new-light-on-aaps-motivations
|title=FOIA request sheds new light on AAP's motivations
|last=Jones
|first=Ryan
|init=
|author-link=Ryan Jones
|website=Circumcision is a Fraud
|date=2022-02-07
|accessdate=2022-08-27
}}</ref>


The AAP allied itself with the [[American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists| American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] (ACOG) and the [[American Academy of Family Physicians]] (AAFP) to produce a new circumcision policy that would claim a medical benefit. A new task force was named with [[Susan Blank]], a doctor with pro-circumcision credentials as chairwoman. The task force was an unusually large eight-member task force with an unusual constitution. It included:
The AAP allied itself with the [[American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists| American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists]] (ACOG) and the [[American Academy of Family Physicians]] (AAFP) to produce a new circumcision policy that would claim a medical benefit. A new task force was named with [[Susan Blank]], a doctor with pro-circumcision credentials as chairwoman. The task force was an unusually large eight-member task force with an unusual constitution. It included: