Circumcision and violence: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Add text and citation.
Line 6: Line 6:
  |date=2016
  |date=2016
  |accessdate=2022-11-05
  |accessdate=2022-11-05
}}</ref>
}}</ref> We do hoewever have some information.


=PDFThe human prepuce is highly innervated tissue<ref name="cold-taylor1999">{{ColdCJ TaylorJR 1999}}| format=PDF</ref> and has long been known for its erogenous quality.<ref name="ErogenousZones">{{WinkelmannRK 1959}}</ref> Falliers (1970) commented on the "sensory pleasure induced by tactile stimulation of the foreskin."<ref name="falliers1970">{{REFjournal
The human prepuce is highly innervated tissue<ref name="cold-taylor1999">{{ColdCJ TaylorJR 1999}}</ref> and has long been known for its erogenous quality.<ref name="ErogenousZones">{{WinkelmannRK 1959}}</ref> Falliers (1970) commented on the "sensory pleasure induced by tactile stimulation of the foreskin."<ref name="falliers1970">{{REFjournal
  |last=Falliers
  |last=Falliers
  |first=
  |first=
Line 50: Line 50:
}}</ref>  
}}</ref>  
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
==Is circumcision violence?==
==Is circumcision itself violence?==
The performance of a circumcision takes very little force but it makes up for that by the extreme level of damage that it does to penile anatomy and function, as well as the extreme [[Pain| pain and trauma]] that it inflicts. Ramos & Boyle (2001) studied the psychological effects of [[circumcision]] on Philippine boys. They reported that sixty-nine percent of traditionally circumcised boys and fifty-one percent of medically circumcised boys met the criteria for a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder ([[PTSD]]).<ref name="ramos-boyle2001">{{REFbook
The performance of a circumcision operation actually takes minimal force, but it makes up for the lack of force by the great damage to the [[penis]] and its many protective, immunological, sensory, and sexual functions,<ref>{{REFweb
|url=http://www.intactaus.org/information/functionsoftheforeskin/
|title=Functions of the Foreskin
|last=Helard
|first=Lou
|author-link=
|publisher=Intact Australia
|website=
|date=2014-08-01
|accessdate=2022-11-07
|format=
|quote=
}}</ref> and also by the extreme [[Pain| pain and trauma]] that it inflicts. Ramos & Boyle (2001) studied the psychological effects of [[circumcision]] on Filippino boys. They reported that sixty-nine percent of traditionally circumcised boys and fifty-one percent of medically [[circumcised]] boys met the criteria for a diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder ([[PTSD]]).<ref name="ramos-boyle2001">{{REFbook
  |last=Ramos
  |last=Ramos
  |first=Samuel
  |first=Samuel
Line 75: Line 87:
  |accessdate=2019-12-08
  |accessdate=2019-12-08
  |note=
  |note=
}}</ref> Bollinger & Chapin (1999) documented the extremely painful and traumatic nature of infant circumcision and identified it as an ''adverse childhood experience''.<ref name="bollinger2019">{{REFdocument
}}</ref>  
  |title=Child Genital Cutting as an Adverse Childhood Experience
 
  |trans-title=
De Mause (1996) argued that early trauma results in aggressive adult behavior.<ref name="demause1996">{{REFjournal
  |language=English
|last=deMause
  |url=http://adversechildhoodexperiences.net/CGC_as_an_ACE.pdf
|first=Lloyd
|init=
|author-link=
|etal=no
  |title=Restaging Fetal Traumas in War and Social Violence
  |journal=Pre- and Perinatal Psychology Journal
|location=
|date=1996
|volume=23
|issue=4
  |pages=344-92
  |url=http://www.mattes.de/buecher/praenatale_psychologie/PP_PDF/PP_08_2_deMause.pdf
  |archived=
  |archived=
|contribution=
  |quote=
  |quote=
  |trans-quote=
  |pubmedID=11609155
|quote-lang=
  |pubmedCID=
|last=Bollinger
  |DOI=
|first=Dan
  |accessdate=2022-11-05
|author-link=Dan Bollinger
|last2=Chapin
  |first2=Georganne
  |author2-link=Georganne Chapin
|publisher=Intact America
|location=Tarrytown, New York, USA
|format=PDF
|date=2019-08-01
  |accessdate=2021-06-30
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
{{ABBR}}
{{ABBR}}
{{REF}}
{{REF}}


[[Category:term]]
[[Category:term]]