Arguments pro circumcision: Difference between revisions
| Line 89: | Line 89: | ||
Exclusionary arguments often try to either push the discussion partner in the corner of a minority so that he must not talk when the majority discusses something - or to ascribe themselves to a special group, whose group rules forbid that outsiders may join in the discussion at all. | Exclusionary arguments often try to either push the discussion partner in the corner of a minority so that he must not talk when the majority discusses something - or to ascribe themselves to a special group, whose group rules forbid that outsiders may join in the discussion at all. | ||
* '''"Those who are not circumcised, can/ may not talk!"''' | * '''"Those who are not circumcised, can / may not talk!"''' | ||
*: An argument of an impressive logic. Then women and men who were not raped, must not be against rape. Who was not already executed, may or may not then have a say even on the death penalty. | *: An argument of an impressive logic. Then women and men who were not raped, must not be against rape. Who was not already executed, may or may not then have a say even on the death penalty. | ||