Circumcision legal commentary: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →2013: Add paper by John Geisheker. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Briefs: Add brief. |
||
| Line 995: | Line 995: | ||
==Briefs== | ==Briefs== | ||
=== Boldt v. Boldt === | |||
The two briefs indexed here were filed by [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]] with the Oregon Supreme Court in the case of [[Boldt v. Boldt]], where they proved instrumental in changing the direction of that case. They have an excellent summary of American Constitutional law relevant to the non-therapeutic circumcision of male children. | The two briefs indexed here were filed by [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]] with the Oregon Supreme Court in the case of [[Boldt v. Boldt]], where they proved instrumental in changing the direction of that case. They have an excellent summary of American Constitutional law relevant to the non-therapeutic circumcision of male children. | ||
| Line 1,021: | Line 1,021: | ||
|date=2007-07 | |date=2007-07 | ||
|accessdate=2020-05-10 | |accessdate=2020-05-10 | ||
}} | |||
=== Hironimus v. Nebus === | |||
* {{REFdocument | |||
|title=Brief of Amici Curiae to the Florida Court of Appeal for the Fourth Circuit | |||
|url=https://pool.intactiwiki.org/w/images/Hironimus_Amicus_Brief_DOC_ARC_IA.pdf | |||
|contribution= | |||
|last= | |||
|first= | |||
|publisher= | |||
|format= | |||
|date= | |||
|format=PDF | |||
|accessdate=2023-10-05 | |||
}} | }} | ||