Sex As Nature Intended It: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Wikify; Add category. |
WikiModEn11 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
== Critics == | == Critics == | ||
The [[circumcision advocate]] website [[Andrew Gross#Circumcision Choice|Circumcision Choice]] | The [[circumcision advocate]] website [[Andrew Gross#Circumcision Choice|Circumcision Choice]] challenged the flaws and bias of O'Hara's study which is the basis of this book. While some of the counter-arguments by [[Andrew Gross#Circumcision Choice|Circumcision Choice]] seem to be valid, the refutation itself also uses wordings which expose the [[Bias| biased view]] pro-circumcision of the ostensibly anonymous author of the refutation which seems to be [[Andrew Gross]].<ref>{{REFweb | ||
|url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/ohara | |url=https://www.circumcisionchoice.com/single-post/ohara | ||
|title=Sex as the researcher intended it | |title=Sex as the researcher intended it | ||