Protection of intact newborns in hospital: Difference between revisions

Add text and Wikify.
Line 21: Line 21:
  |DOI=10.1001/jama.1965.03090030045013  
  |DOI=10.1001/jama.1965.03090030045013  
  |accessdate=2024-05-21
  |accessdate=2024-05-21
}}</ref> Non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of newborn boys remains a common practice despite its harmful and unethical nature. Circumcision is a profit center for hospitals, so many will promote circumcision in various ways. It is easy for a nursery attendant to make a mistake and bring an [[intact]] boy for an unwanted [[circumcision]].  
}}</ref> Non-therapeutic [[circumcision]] of newborn boys remains a common practice despite its harmful and unethical nature. Circumcision is a profit center for hospitals, so many will promote circumcision in various ways. It is easy for a nursery attendant to make a mistake and bring an [[intact]] boy for an unwanted [[circumcision]]. A [[circumcision]] that has been performed without valid [[informed consent]] is a [[wrongful circumcision]].


Mansfield et al. (1995) report, when a newborn is to be [[circumcised]], both mother and newborn remain in hospital an average of six hours longer, which substantially increases revenue to the hospital,<ref name="mansfield1995">{{REFjournal
Mansfield et al. (1995) report, when a newborn is to be [[circumcised]], both mother and newborn remain in hospital an average of six hours longer, which substantially increases revenue to the hospital,<ref name="mansfield1995">{{REFjournal
Line 131: Line 131:
* [[Care of intact, foreskinned boys]]
* [[Care of intact, foreskinned boys]]
* [[Intact-friendly doctors list]]
* [[Intact-friendly doctors list]]
* [[Wrongful circumcision]]
* [[United States of America]]
* [[United States of America]]
  {{LINKS}}
  {{LINKS}}