Jonathan Abraham: Difference between revisions

No edit summary
Line 47: Line 47:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


==Legality of non-therapeutic circumcision of minor boys.==
==Legal commentary==
Infant circumcision has no medical indication and does not treat or prevent disease and is irreversible. It is considered to be a violation of a boy's [[human rights]] under international law.
* {{REFjournal
 
|last=Adler
Infant boys are unable to grant consent for amputation of a functional body part.
|first=Peter W.
|init=PW
|author-link=Peter W. Adler
|title=Is circumcision legal?
|journal=Richmond Journal of Law and the Public Interest
|date=2013
|volume=16
|issue=3
|pages=439-86
|url=https://scholarship.richmond.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1265&context=jolpi
|format=PDF
|accessdate=2024-11-09
}}
* {{REFjournal
|last=Geisheker
|init=JV
|author-link=
|url=https://www.newmalestudies.com/OJS/index.php/nms/article/view/60
|title=The Completely Unregulated Practice of Male Circumcision: Human Rights’ Abuse Enshrined in Law?
|journal=New Male Studies
|date=2013
|volume=2
|issue=1
|pages=18-45
|format=PDF
|accessdate=2023-11-09
}}
{{SEEALSO}}
{{SEEALSO}}
* [[Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3]]
* [[Re B and G (children) (No 2) EWFC 3]]