Surgical foreskin restoration: Difference between revisions
added interwiki link |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →The jump to non-surgical methods: Revise text and add citation. |
||
| Line 231: | Line 231: | ||
Despite the possible complications of surgery and the inevitable presence of scars, the main disadvantage seems to be the different color and texture of the original [[penile skin]] and the graft. This outcome may not be what the patient had expected; therefore, most foreskin restoration seekers nowadays prefer [[Tissue expansion|skin expansion]] systems, which avoid these problems. | Despite the possible complications of surgery and the inevitable presence of scars, the main disadvantage seems to be the different color and texture of the original [[penile skin]] and the graft. This outcome may not be what the patient had expected; therefore, most foreskin restoration seekers nowadays prefer [[Tissue expansion|skin expansion]] systems, which avoid these problems. | ||
Although surgical foreskin restoration is practiced today, there are a few reports by individual patients in the social, not medical, literature.<ref>{{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.reddit.com/r/foreskin_restoration/comments/zxnfp2/my_experience_with_surgical_reconstruction_part_1/ | |||
|title=My Experience With Surgical Reconstruction - Part 1 | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|first= | |||
|init= | |||
|author-link= | |||
|publisher=REDDIT | |||
|date=2022 | |||
|accessdate=2025-11-13 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
==A new surgical technique from India== | ==A new surgical technique from India== | ||