Ethics of non-therapeutic child circumcision: Difference between revisions

Add citation.
Line 68: Line 68:
  |accessdate=2025-06-30
  |accessdate=2025-06-30
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
Circumcision ([[MGM]]) of male minors violates every one of these principles of medical ethics.
Circumcision ([[MGM]]) of male minors violates every one of these principles of medical ethics.<ref>{{REFweb
|url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/medical-ethics/
|title=Medical Ethics and the Non-therapeutic Circumcision of Male Children
|last=Anonymous
|first=
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision
|date=2020-08
|accessdate=2025-06-29
}}
</ref>


Male circumcisions are usually performed by medical doctors for profit, so the more specific principles of <b>medical ethics</b> or <b>bioethics</b> are applicable to the practice of [[circumcision]].  
Male circumcisions are usually performed by medical doctors for profit, so the more specific principles of <b>medical ethics</b> or <b>bioethics</b> are applicable to the practice of [[circumcision]].  
Line 357: Line 368:
}}</ref> This may mean that the AAP now recognizes the child as a person with legal rights of his/her own.
}}</ref> This may mean that the AAP now recognizes the child as a person with legal rights of his/her own.


Boys are born with a healthy [[foreskin]] that is free of disease. There are no medical indications for a neonatal [[circumcision]]. The [[medical trade association| medical trade associations]] and other promoters have put forward various alleged benefits from neonatal circumcision for decades to develop business for their physican-members.
Boys are born with a healthy [[foreskin]] that is free of disease. The [[medical trade association| medical trade associations]] and other promoters have put forward various alleged benefits from neonatal circumcision for decades to develop business for their physican-members, but they are not valid. There are no medical indications for a neonatal [[circumcision]].  


The validity of surrogate consent for non-therapeutic circumcision of boys has been questioned for decades.<ref name="povenmire"/> <ref name="richards" /> <ref name="hill2003">{{REFjournal
The validity of surrogate consent for non-therapeutic circumcision of boys has been questioned for decades.<ref name="povenmire"/> <ref name="richards" /> <ref name="hill2003">{{REFjournal
Line 1,020: Line 1,031:
  |accessdate=2023-05-27
  |accessdate=2023-05-27
}}</ref>
}}</ref>
* {{REFweb
*  
|url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/medical-ethics/
|title=Medical Ethics and the Non-therapeutic Circumcision of Male Children
|last=Anonymous
|first=
|init=
|author-link=
|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision
|date=2020-08
|accessdate=2025-06-29
}}
 


{{REF}}
{{REF}}