Surgical foreskin restoration: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Contemporary surgical foreskin restoration: Add text and Wikify. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →The jump to non-surgical methods: Add text and citations. |
||
| Line 228: | Line 228: | ||
While reviewing the results of the implanted-ring procedure, an engineer living in the Pacific Northwest hit upon the idea of using tape to hold the [[skin]] in place over the [[glans]]. His intent was to avoid both the surgery needed to have the platinum ring implanted and the unsightly fibrous band it left. This simple idea was circulated among a small network of men who had been sharing whatever information they could find on [[foreskin restoration]] as well as their ideas and experimentation. As a result, in 1982, [[BUFF]] (Brothers United for Future Foreskins) was born.<ref name="bigelow1994"/> | While reviewing the results of the implanted-ring procedure, an engineer living in the Pacific Northwest hit upon the idea of using tape to hold the [[skin]] in place over the [[glans]]. His intent was to avoid both the surgery needed to have the platinum ring implanted and the unsightly fibrous band it left. This simple idea was circulated among a small network of men who had been sharing whatever information they could find on [[foreskin restoration]] as well as their ideas and experimentation. As a result, in 1982, [[BUFF]] (Brothers United for Future Foreskins) was born.<ref name="bigelow1994"/> | ||
Despite the possible complications of surgery and the inevitable presence of scars, the main disadvantage seems to be the different color and texture of the original [[penile skin]] and the graft. This outcome may not be what the patient had expected; therefore, most foreskin restoration seekers nowadays prefer [[Tissue expansion|skin expansion]] systems, which avoid these problems. | Despite the possible complications of surgery and the inevitable presence of scars, the main disadvantage seems to be the different color and texture of the original [[penile skin]] and the graft. This outcome may not be what the patient had expected; therefore, most foreskin restoration seekers nowadays prefer [[Tissue expansion|skin expansion]] systems, which avoid these problems. NORM and Doctors Opposing Circumcision do not recommend non-surgical foreskin restoration.<ref>{{REFweb | ||
|url=https://norm.org/foreskin-restoration/surgical-restoration/ | |||
|title=Surgical Restoration | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|publisher=NORM | |||
|date= | |||
|accessdate=2026-04-30 | |||
}}</ref> <ref>{{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.doctorsopposingcircumcision.org/for-professionals/foreskin-restoration/ | |||
|title=Non-surgical Foreskin Restoration | |||
|last=Anonymous | |||
|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision | |||
|date=2023-04 | |||
|accessdate=2026-04-30 | |||
}}</ref> | |||
==Contemporary surgical foreskin restoration== | ==Contemporary surgical foreskin restoration== | ||