Australia: Difference between revisions
m reformattings; add REF and first category |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add Gairdner |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
The incidence of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision in Australia approached that of the United States in the 1930s through 1960s. | The incidence of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision in Australia approached that of the United States in the 1930s through 1960s. | ||
[[Douglas Gairdner]],s famous, classic paper, ''The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision'',<ref name="gairdner1949">{{REFjournal | |||
|last=Gairdner | |||
|first=Douglas M. | |||
|title=The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision | |||
|journal=British Medical Journal | |||
|volume=2 | |||
|issue=4642 | |||
|pages=1433-1437 | |||
|url= | |||
|quote= | |||
|pubmedID=15408299 | |||
|pubmedCID=2051968 | |||
|DOI=10.1136/bmj.2.4642.1433 | |||
|date=1949 | |||
|accessdate=2019-10-28 | |||
}}</ref> seems to have had no effect in Australia. | |||
The ''Australian Paediatric Journal'' issue of June 1970, published three articles critical of non-therapeutic infant circumcision.<ref>{{REFjournal | The ''Australian Paediatric Journal'' issue of June 1970, published three articles critical of non-therapeutic infant circumcision.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||