Difference between revisions of "Australia"
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Add Wright paper) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) (Clean-up) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
Wright (1967) slammed the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="wright1967">{{REFjournal | Wright (1967) slammed the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision.<ref name="wright1967">{{REFjournal | ||
| − | + | |last=Wright | |
| − | + | |first=JE | |
| − | + | |author-link= | |
| − | + | |etal=no | |
| − | + | |title=Non-therapeutic circumcision | |
| − | + | |trans-title= | |
| − | + | |language= | |
| − | + | |journal=Med J Aust | |
| − | + | location= | |
| − | + | |date=1967-05-27 | |
| − | + | |volume=1 | |
| − | + | |issue= | |
| − | + | |pages=1083-7 | |
| − | + | |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/general/wright4/ | |
| − | + | |quote= | |
| − | + | |pubmedID=6028342 | |
| − | + | |pubmedCID= | |
| − | + | |DOI= | |
| − | + | |accessdate=2019-10-28 | |
| − | + | }}</ref> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | }}</ref> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
The ''Australian Paediatric Journal'' issue of June 1970, published three articles critical of non-therapeutic infant circumcision.<ref>{{REFjournal | The ''Australian Paediatric Journal'' issue of June 1970, published three articles critical of non-therapeutic infant circumcision.<ref>{{REFjournal | ||
Revision as of 14:08, 28 October 2019
Construction Site
This article is work in progress and not yet part of the free encyclopedia IntactiWiki.
A report on circumcision in Australia.
Australia, like other English-speaking countries, once had a rather high rate of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision of male infants, however Australia now has a very low rate of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision.
History
The indigeous people of Australia, the Aborgines, have variously practiced subincision and circumcision since before the first contact with Europeans.
The incidence of non-therapeutic neonatal circumcision in Australia approached that of the United States in the 1930s through 1960s.
Douglas Gairdner's famous, classic 1949 paper, The Fate of the Foreskin: A Study of Circumcision,[1] seems to have had no effect in Australia.
Wright (1967) slammed the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision.[2]
The Australian Paediatric Journal issue of June 1970, published three articles critical of non-therapeutic infant circumcision.[3][4][5]
Position statements of medical societies
After considering the three papers published in the Australian Paediatric Journal, the Australian Paediatric Society adopted a resolution on April 24, 1971 that the circumcision of male infants should not be performed as a routine measure. That resolution subsequently was reported in a letter published in the Medical Journal of Australia on May 22, 1971.[6]
External links
Young, Hugh (2005). Circumcision in Australia
, Circumstitions. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
References
- ↑
Gairdner, Douglas M.. The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision. British Medical Journal. 1949; 2(4642): 1433-1437. PMID. PMC. DOI. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
- ↑ Wright, JE. Non-therapeutic circumcision. Med J Aust
location=. 27 May 1967; 1: 1083-7. PMID. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
- ↑ Leitch, I.O., et al. Circumcision: the continuing enigma. Aust Paediatr J. March 1970; 6(1): 59-65. PMID. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- ↑ Birrell, R.G.. Circumcision. Aust Paediatr J. June 1960; 6(2): 66-7. PMID. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- ↑ Smith, E.D.. Another view of circumcision. Aust Paediatr J. June 1970; 6(2): 67-9. PMID. Retrieved 27 October 2019.
- ↑ Belmaine, SP. Circumcision. Medical Journal of Australia. 22 May 1971; 1: 1148. Retrieved 28 October 2019.
