Australia: Difference between revisions

Line 110:

==Position statements of medical societies==

After considering the three papers published in the ''Australian Paediatric Journal'', the [http://auspaediatrics.com.au/ Australian Paediatric Society] adopted a resolution on April 24, 1971 that the circumcision of male infants should not be performed as a routine measure. That resolution subsequently was reported in a letter published in the ''Medical Journal of Australia'' on May 22, 1971.<ref name="belmaine1971">{{REFjournal

After considering the three papers published in the ''Australian Paediatric Journal'', the [http://auspaediatrics.com.au/ Australian Paediatric Society] adopted a resolution on April 24, 1971 that the circumcision of male infants should not be performed as a routine measure. That resolution subsequently was reported in a letter by Belmaine published in the ''Medical Journal of Australia'' on May 22, 1971.<ref name="belmaine1971">{{REFjournal

|last=Belmaine

|first=SP

Line 124:

}}</ref>

The incidence of non-therapeutic child circumcision in Australia started to decline after the publication of the ~~Belaine~~ (1971) letter. By 1978, only 50 percent of newborn boys were being circumcised.

The incidence of non-therapeutic child circumcision in Australia started to decline after the publication of the Bemaine (1971) letter. By 1978, only 50 percent of newborn boys were being circumcised.

The incidence of circumcision continued to decline, so that by 1996, when the Australian College of Paediatrics issued a statement, it reported that the incidence of "routine" (i.e. non-therapeutic) circumcision was estimated at ten percent of newborn boys.<ref name-"acp1996>{{REFweb

@@ Line 110: / Line 110: @@
 ==Position statements of medical societies==
-After considering the three papers published in the  ''Australian Paediatric Journal'', the [http://auspaediatrics.com.au/ Australian Paediatric Society] adopted a resolution on April 24, 1971 that the circumcision of male infants should not be performed as a routine measure.  That resolution subsequently was reported in a letter published in the ''Medical Journal of Australia'' on May 22, 1971.<ref name="belmaine1971">{{REFjournal
+After considering the three papers published in the  ''Australian Paediatric Journal'', the [http://auspaediatrics.com.au/ Australian Paediatric Society] adopted a resolution on April 24, 1971 that the circumcision of male infants should not be performed as a routine measure.  That resolution subsequently was reported in a letter by Belmaine published in the ''Medical Journal of Australia'' on May 22, 1971.<ref name="belmaine1971">{{REFjournal
   |last=Belmaine
   |first=SP
@@ Line 124: / Line 124: @@
 }}</ref>
-The incidence of non-therapeutic child circumcision in Australia started to decline after the publication of the Belaine (1971) letter.  By 1978, only 50 percent of newborn boys were being circumcised.
+The incidence of non-therapeutic child circumcision in Australia started to decline after the publication of the Bemaine (1971) letter.  By 1978, only 50 percent of newborn boys were being circumcised.
 The incidence of circumcision continued to decline, so that by 1996, when the Australian College of Paediatrics issued a statement, it reported that the incidence of "routine" (i.e. non-therapeutic) circumcision was estimated at ten percent of newborn boys.<ref name-"acp1996>{{REFweb