Holm Putzke: Difference between revisions

Line 21:

* Co-editor of the Journal for the Study of Law (ZJS)

* Co-editor of "Schriften zur rechtswissenschaftlichen Didaktik" ''(writings on jurisprudence didactics)''

* Co-editor of "Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik"<ref>http://www.zis-online.com</ref> ''('Journal of International ~~criminal law doctrine~~)''

* Co-editor of "Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik"<ref>{{REFweb

|url=http://www.zis-online.com

|title=ZIS - Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik

|trans-title=ZIS - Journal of International Criminal Law Dogmatics

|language=German

|accessdate=2019-11-12

}}</ref> ''(Journal of International Criminal Law Dogmatics)''

== Commitment against the circumcision of boys ==

Prior to the enforcement of [[German Circumcision Act|§ 1631d BGB]] Putzke has represented the legal opinion in several scientific articles that the not medically necessary [[MGM|circumcision of boys]] is an element of crime of assault, including the religious [[circumcision]] of boys. He welcomed and encouraged the spread of the judgment<ref>http://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=LG%20K%F6ln&Datum=07.05.2012&Aktenzeichen=151%20Ns%20169/11</ref> of the District Court of Cologne which classified a male [[circumcision]] for religious reasons as unlawful assault.

Prior to the enforcement of [[German Circumcision Act|§ 1631d BGB]] Putzke has represented the legal opinion in several scientific articles that the not medically necessary [[MGM|circumcision of boys]] is an element of crime of assault, including the religious [[circumcision]] of boys. He welcomed and encouraged the spread of the judgment<ref>{{REFweb

|url=http://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=LG%20K%F6ln&Datum=07.05.2012&Aktenzeichen=151%20Ns%20169/11

|title=Rechtsprechung, LG Köln, 07.05.2012 - 151 Ns 169/11

|trans-title=Jurisprudence, LG Cologne, 07 May 2012 - 151 Ns 169/11

|language=German

|accessdate=2019-11-12

}}</ref> of the District Court of Cologne which classified a male [[circumcision]] for religious reasons as unlawful assault.

The German Bundestag did not follow Putzke's argument and decided on [[2012-12-12|December ~~12,~~ 2012]] after a controversial debate with 434 to 100 votes with 46 abstentions, to enforce a law that allows boy's [[circumcision]] under certain conditions. Putzke estimated the law is unconstitutional and accused the Bundestag to habe created 'legal nonsense', e.g. as far as the [[Mohel clause|purpose clause]] is concerned.

The German Bundestag did not follow Putzke's argument and decided on [[2012-12-12|12 December 2012]] after a controversial debate with 434 to 100 votes with 46 abstentions, to enforce a law that allows boy's [[circumcision]] under certain conditions. Putzke estimated the law is unconstitutional and accused the Bundestag to habe created 'legal nonsense', e.g. as far as the [[Mohel clause|purpose clause]] is concerned.

(Source: [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holm_Putzke Wikipedia])

@@ Line 21: / Line 21: @@
 * Co-editor of the Journal for the Study of Law (ZJS)
 * Co-editor of "Schriften zur rechtswissenschaftlichen Didaktik" ''(writings on jurisprudence didactics)''
-* Co-editor of "Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik"<ref>http://www.zis-online.com</ref> ''('Journal of International criminal law doctrine)''
+* Co-editor of "Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik"<ref>{{REFweb
+ |url=http://www.zis-online.com
+ |title=ZIS - Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik
+ |trans-title=ZIS - Journal of International Criminal Law Dogmatics
+ |language=German
+ |accessdate=2019-11-12
+}}</ref> ''(Journal of International Criminal Law Dogmatics)''
 == Commitment against the circumcision of boys ==
-Prior to the enforcement of [[German Circumcision Act|§ 1631d BGB]] Putzke has represented the legal opinion in several scientific articles that the not medically necessary [[MGM|circumcision of boys]] is an element of crime of assault, including the religious [[circumcision]] of boys. He welcomed and encouraged the spread of the judgment<ref>http://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=LG%20K%F6ln&Datum=07.05.2012&Aktenzeichen=151%20Ns%20169/11</ref> of the District Court of Cologne which classified a male [[circumcision]] for religious reasons as unlawful assault.
+Prior to the enforcement of [[German Circumcision Act|§ 1631d BGB]] Putzke has represented the legal opinion in several scientific articles that the not medically necessary [[MGM|circumcision of boys]] is an element of crime of assault, including the religious [[circumcision]] of boys. He welcomed and encouraged the spread of the judgment<ref>{{REFweb
+ |url=http://dejure.org/dienste/vernetzung/rechtsprechung?Gericht=LG%20K%F6ln&Datum=07.05.2012&Aktenzeichen=151%20Ns%20169/11
+ |title=Rechtsprechung, LG Köln, 07.05.2012 - 151 Ns 169/11
+ |trans-title=Jurisprudence, LG Cologne, 07 May 2012 - 151 Ns 169/11
+ |language=German
+ |accessdate=2019-11-12
+}}</ref> of the District Court of Cologne which classified a male [[circumcision]] for religious reasons as unlawful assault.
-The German Bundestag did not follow Putzke's argument and decided on [[2012-12-12|December 12, 2012]] after a controversial debate with 434 to 100 votes with 46 abstentions, to enforce a law that allows boy's [[circumcision]] under certain conditions. Putzke estimated the law is unconstitutional and accused the Bundestag to habe created 'legal nonsense', e.g. as far as the [[Mohel clause|purpose clause]] is concerned.
+The German Bundestag did not follow Putzke's argument and decided on [[2012-12-12|12 December 2012]] after a controversial debate with 434 to 100 votes with 46 abstentions, to enforce a law that allows boy's [[circumcision]] under certain conditions. Putzke estimated the law is unconstitutional and accused the Bundestag to habe created 'legal nonsense', e.g. as far as the [[Mohel clause|purpose clause]] is concerned.
 (Source: [http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Holm_Putzke Wikipedia])