Sexual injury of circumcision: Difference between revisions

Line 1:

The '''sexual effects of circumcision''' are ~~the subject of some debate~~. Studies have been conducted to investigate the effect of circumcision (amputation of the [[foreskin]]) on sexual drive, erectile function, premature and delayed ejaculation, sexual satisfaction, sexual sensation and penile sensitivity. Studies have also assessed whether [[circumcision]] affects [[masturbation]] or other sexual practices, and the degree to which a heterosexual woman's experience of sex is affected by her partner's circumcision status. Cold & Taylor (1999) stated:

The '''sexual effects of circumcision''' are now well documented. Studies have been conducted to investigate the effect of circumcision (amputation of the [[foreskin]]) on sexual drive, erectile function, premature and delayed ejaculation, sexual satisfaction, sexual sensation and penile sensitivity. Studies have also assessed whether [[circumcision]] affects [[masturbation]] or other sexual practices, and the degree to which a heterosexual woman's experience of sex is affected by her partner's circumcision status. Cold & Taylor (1999) stated:

The prepuce is primary, erogenous tissue necessary for normal sexual function.<ref name="cold-taylor1999">{{REFjournal

Line 28:

===In the beginning===

The human foreskin was once thought to have little or no sexual function. Sex researcher Alfred C. Kinsey (1948) placed no importance on the presence or absence of the foreskin.<ref name="kinsey1948">{{REFbook

The human [[foreskin]] was once thought to have little or no sexual function. Sex researcher Alfred C. Kinsey (1948) placed no importance on the presence or absence of the foreskin.<ref name="kinsey1948">{{REFbook

|last=Kinsey

|first=Alfred C.

Line 115:

}}</ref>

The inaccurate reports of Kinsey (1948) and Masters & Johnson (1966) have long distorted the American view of the effects of [[circumcision]] and the loss of the [[foreskin]].

The inaccurate reports of Kinsey (1948) and Masters & Johnson (1966) have long distorted the American view of the sexual effects of [[circumcision]] and the loss of the [[foreskin]].

===The dawning of the light===

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
-The '''sexual effects of circumcision''' are the subject of some debate. Studies have been conducted to investigate the effect of circumcision (amputation of the [[foreskin]]) on sexual drive, erectile function, premature and delayed ejaculation, sexual satisfaction, sexual sensation and penile sensitivity. Studies have also assessed whether [[circumcision]] affects [[masturbation]] or other sexual practices, and the degree to which a heterosexual woman's experience of sex is affected by her partner's circumcision status. Cold & Taylor (1999) stated:
+The '''sexual effects of circumcision''' are now well documented. Studies have been conducted to investigate the effect of circumcision (amputation of the [[foreskin]]) on sexual drive, erectile function, premature and delayed ejaculation, sexual satisfaction, sexual sensation and penile sensitivity. Studies have also assessed whether [[circumcision]] affects [[masturbation]] or other sexual practices, and the degree to which a heterosexual woman's experience of sex is affected by her partner's circumcision status. Cold & Taylor (1999) stated:
 <blockquote>
 The prepuce is primary, erogenous tissue necessary for normal sexual  function.<ref name="cold-taylor1999">{{REFjournal
@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 ===In the beginning===
-The human foreskin was once thought to have little or no sexual function.   Sex researcher Alfred C. Kinsey (1948) placed no importance on the presence or absence of the foreskin.<ref name="kinsey1948">{{REFbook
+The human [[foreskin]] was once thought to have little or no sexual function.   Sex researcher Alfred C. Kinsey (1948) placed no importance on the presence or absence of the foreskin.<ref name="kinsey1948">{{REFbook
   |last=Kinsey
   |first=Alfred C.
@@ Line 115: / Line 115: @@
 }}</ref>
-The inaccurate reports of Kinsey (1948) and Masters & Johnson (1966) have long distorted the American view of the effects of [[circumcision]] and the loss of the [[foreskin]].
+The inaccurate reports of Kinsey (1948) and Masters & Johnson (1966) have long distorted the American view of the sexual effects of [[circumcision]] and the loss of the [[foreskin]].
 ===The dawning of the light===