Difference between revisions of "Antisemitism"

From IntactiWiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
[[Intactivists]] are often subject to a generalized anti-Semitism, because they also engage against [[MGM]] on boys of Jewish parents. These allegations are generally unfounded, if only because the deliberate exclusion of the boys of Jewish parents in legal questions would be a group-specific special treatment, which in turn would have to be regarded as anti-Semitism, following the logics.
+
Every now and then, [[intactivists]] are generally assumed to be anti-Semitic, because they also engage against [[MGM]] on boys of Jewish parents. These allegations are generally unfounded, if only because the deliberate exclusion of the boys of Jewish parents in legal questions would be a group-specific special treatment, which in turn would has to be regarded as anti-Semitism, following the logics. If intactivists were to protect all children from genital mutilation that was not medically indicated, but omit the children of Jewish parents, they would have to be accused of anti-Semitism.
  
A uniform, generally binding definition of anti-Semitism doesn't seem to exist.
+
A uniform, generally binding definition of anti-Semitism doesn't seem to exist. There are different attempts at a definition.
 
 
==Anti-Semitism contradiction==
 
  
 +
== Anti-Semitism contradiction ==
 
The German website ''zwangsbeschneidung.de'' sees an "anti-Semitism contradiction in the Jewish religion created by [[Circumcision]]":
 
The German website ''zwangsbeschneidung.de'' sees an "anti-Semitism contradiction in the Jewish religion created by [[Circumcision]]":
 
{{Citation
 
{{Citation
| Text=Anti-Semitism is definitely the violation of the human rights of a Jew because he is a Jew, circumcision of the male child is a violation of human rights, Jewish circumcision is done because the child is a Jew, so Jewish circumcision is an anti-Semitic act.
+
|Text=Anti-Semitism is definitely the violation of the human rights of a Jew because he is a Jew, circumcision of the male child is a violation of human rights, Jewish circumcision is done because the child is a Jew, so Jewish circumcision is an anti-Semitic act.<br>
 
+
The conclusion is that if circumcision is the foundation of the Jewish religion, the foundation of the Jewish religion is an anti-Semitic act.<br>
The conclusion is that if circumcision is the foundation of the Jewish religion, the foundation of the Jewish religion is an anti-Semitic act.
 
 
 
 
[[German Circumcision Act|§ 1631d BGB]] was created to enable Jewish circumcision. § 1631d BGB is therefore anti-Semitism by law. Anti-Semitism by law is fascist legislation.
 
[[German Circumcision Act|§ 1631d BGB]] was created to enable Jewish circumcision. § 1631d BGB is therefore anti-Semitism by law. Anti-Semitism by law is fascist legislation.
| Author=N.N.
+
|Author=N.N.
| Source=www.zwangsbeschneidung.de
+
|Source=www.zwangsbeschneidung.de
| ref=<ref>http://www.zwangsbeschneidung.de/presse-2016.html#beschneidung-antisemitismuswiderspruch-judentum</ref>}}
+
|ref=<ref>http://www.zwangsbeschneidung.de/presse-2016.html#beschneidung-antisemitismuswiderspruch-judentum</ref>}}
 
{{REF}}
 
{{REF}}
  

Revision as of 16:54, 3 February 2020

Every now and then, intactivists are generally assumed to be anti-Semitic, because they also engage against MGM on boys of Jewish parents. These allegations are generally unfounded, if only because the deliberate exclusion of the boys of Jewish parents in legal questions would be a group-specific special treatment, which in turn would has to be regarded as anti-Semitism, following the logics. If intactivists were to protect all children from genital mutilation that was not medically indicated, but omit the children of Jewish parents, they would have to be accused of anti-Semitism.

A uniform, generally binding definition of anti-Semitism doesn't seem to exist. There are different attempts at a definition.

Anti-Semitism contradiction

The German website zwangsbeschneidung.de sees an "anti-Semitism contradiction in the Jewish religion created by Circumcision":

Anti-Semitism is definitely the violation of the human rights of a Jew because he is a Jew, circumcision of the male child is a violation of human rights, Jewish circumcision is done because the child is a Jew, so Jewish circumcision is an anti-Semitic act.

The conclusion is that if circumcision is the foundation of the Jewish religion, the foundation of the Jewish religion is an anti-Semitic act.

§ 1631d BGB was created to enable Jewish circumcision. § 1631d BGB is therefore anti-Semitism by law. Anti-Semitism by law is fascist legislation.
– N.N. (www.zwangsbeschneidung.de)[1]

References