Boldt v. Boldt: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Legal proceedings: Minor text editing for clarity. |
||
| Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
The child’s proposed circumcision, at one point only hours away, remains judicially prohibited.<ref name="geisheker2010">{{REFjournal | The child’s proposed circumcision, at one point only hours away, remains judicially prohibited so the proposed circumcision was never carried out.<ref name="geisheker2010">{{REFjournal | ||
|last=Geisheker | |last=Geisheker | ||
|first=John V. | |first=John V. | ||
| Line 144: | Line 144: | ||
[[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]] filed two ''amicus curiae'' briefs in this case and was successful in protecting the boy's [[foreskin]] from [[circumcision]]. | [[Doctors Opposing Circumcision (D.O.C.)]] filed two ''amicus curiae'' briefs in this case and was successful in protecting the boy's [[foreskin]] from [[circumcision]]. | ||
The case also set a legal precedent regarding the rights of the male child to | The case also set a legal precedent regarding the rights of the male child to judicial protection of his person. | ||
==Commentary on Boldt v. Boldt== | ==Commentary on Boldt v. Boldt== | ||