Circumcision legal commentary: Difference between revisions

Add text.
mNo edit summary
Line 442: Line 442:




[[Holm Putzke|Putzke]] (2008) points out that there is a criminal relevance of circumcising boys.
Professor [[Holm Putzke|Putzke]] (2008) points out that there is a criminal relevance of circumcising boys.
* {{REFdocument
* {{REFdocument
  |url=http://www.holmputzke.de/images/stories/pdf/2008_putzke%20fs%20herzberg%20essay%20on%20circumcision.pdf
  |url=http://www.holmputzke.de/images/stories/pdf/2008_putzke%20fs%20herzberg%20essay%20on%20circumcision.pdf
Line 453: Line 453:
  |accessdate=2020-05-08
  |accessdate=2020-05-08
}}
}}


Professor Peter W. Adler, J. D., (2011) argues that it is unlawful for United States Medicaid to pay for non-therapeutic circumcision.
Professor Peter W. Adler, J. D., (2011) argues that it is unlawful for United States Medicaid to pay for non-therapeutic circumcision.