Circumcision legal commentary: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Commentaries: Add DOC Chapter 10. |
||
| Line 557: | Line 557: | ||
|accessdate=2020-05-10 | |accessdate=2020-05-10 | ||
}} | }} | ||
Doctors Opposing Circumcision included this commentary on the law of circumcision of boys in their June 2008 ''Genital Integrity Statement''. It has since been later amended by another party to include a reference to Adler (2013) that was not available at the time of writing. | |||
* {{REFbook | |||
|last=Hill | |||
|first=George | |||
|author-link= | |||
|year=2008 | |||
|title=Ch. 10: American Law and the Circumcision of Children | |||
|url=https://www.i2researchhub.org/articles/ch-10-american-law-and-the-circumcision-of-children-doc-genital-integrity-statement/ | |||
|work=Genital Integrity Policy | |||
|editor= | |||
|edition= | |||
|volume= | |||
|chapter= | |||
|pages= | |||
|location=Seattle | |||
|publisher=Doctors Opposing Circumcision | |||
|isbn= | |||
|quote= | |||
|accessdate=2020-05-14 | |||
|note= | |||
}} | |||
Professor [[Holm Putzke|Putzke]] (2008) points out that there is a criminal relevance of circumcising boys. | Professor [[Holm Putzke|Putzke]] (2008) points out that there is a criminal relevance of circumcising boys. | ||