Circumcision and STDs: Difference between revisions

Line 139: Line 139:
  |pubmedCID=1195083
  |pubmedCID=1195083
  |DOI=10.1136/sti.69.4.262
  |DOI=10.1136/sti.69.4.262
  |accessdate=2020-05-04
  |accessdate=2020-05-24
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


Line 171: Line 171:
}}</ref>
}}</ref>


 
Donovan ''et al''. (1994) surveyed men at a sexual disease clinic in Sydney, NSW, Australia. They reported:
<blockquote>
In this clinic-based prospectively collected survey we found no association between male circumcision status and STDs that are common in our population. Perhaps importantly, our study group was relatively racially homogeneous, lack of circumcision was not a marker of lower socioeconomic status (using the index of education level; Table 2), and we controlled for a major parameter of sexual behaviour (lifetime number of sexual partners).<ref name="donovan1994">{{REFjournal
|last=Donovan
|first=Basil
|author-link=
|last2=Bassett
|first2=I
|author2-link=
|last3=Bodsworth
|first3=NJ
|author3-link=
|etal=no
|title=Male circumcision and common sexually transmissible diseases in a developed nation setting
|trans-title=
|language=
|journal=Genitourin Med
|location=
|date=1994-10
|volume=70
|issue=
|pages=317-20
|url=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1195274/pdf/genitmed00023-0023.pdf
|archived=
|quote=
|pubmedID=8001942
|pubmedCID=1195274
|DOI=10.1136/sti.70.5.317
|accessdate=2020-05-24
}}</ref>
</blockquote>
{{LINKS}}
{{LINKS}}