Circumcision legal commentary: Difference between revisions

Wikify "circumcision".
Add Miller paper.
Line 6: Line 6:


==Commentaries==
==Commentaries==
T. L. Fisher (1966), an officer of the [https://www.cmpa-acpm.ca/en/home Canadian Medical Protective Association], discussed the legal dangers of using outmoded treatment. This is, of course, relevant to the outmoded practice of circumcision of male children.
T. L. Fisher (1966), an officer of the [https://www.cmpa-acpm.ca/en/home Canadian Medical Protective Association], discussed the legal dangers of using outmoded treatment. This is, of course, relevant to the outmoded practice of circumcision of male children.
* {{REFjournal
* {{REFjournal
Line 139: Line 140:




Sebastian Poulter (1986) argues that parents may authorise the non-therapeutic circumcision of a male minor under English law. Later British court decisions call his comments into question.
Sebastian Poulter (1986) argued that parents may authorise the non-therapeutic circumcision of a male minor under English law. Later British court decisions call his comments into question.
* {{REFbook
* {{REFbook
  |last=Poulter
  |last=Poulter
Line 152: Line 153:




[[Charles A. Bonner|Bonner]] & Kinane (1989) discuss the legal and constitutional issues of non-therapeutic male circumcision under United States and California law.
[[Charles A. Bonner|Bonner]] & Kinane (1989) discussed the legal and constitutional issues of non-therapeutic male circumcision under United States and California law.
* {{REFjournal
* {{REFjournal
  |last=Bonner
  |last=Bonner
Line 446: Line 447:
  |accessdate=2020-05-08
  |accessdate=2020-05-08
}}
}}


Giannetti (2000) argues that scientific misconduct in the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] circumcision policy statements should expose the AAP to trade association liability.
Giannetti (2000) argues that scientific misconduct in the [[American Academy of Pediatrics]] circumcision policy statements should expose the AAP to trade association liability.
Line 496: Line 498:




Peter W. Edge (2000) discusses the impact of the Human Rights Act (1998) on the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision of male children in the United Kingdom.
Peter W. Edge (2000) discussed the impact of the Human Rights Act (1998) on the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision of male children in the United Kingdom.


* {{REFjournal
* {{REFjournal
Line 510: Line 512:
  |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/edge1/
  |url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/edge1/
  |accessdate=2020-05-10
  |accessdate=2020-05-10
}}
Geoffrey P. Miller (2002) discussed the impact of American culture on the law of circumcision.
* {{REFjournal
|last=Miller
|first=Geoffrey
|author-link=
|title=Circumcision: Cultural-Legal Analysis
|journal=Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law.
|date=2002-3
|volume=9
|issue=
|pages=497-585
|url=http://www.cirp.org/library/legal/miller1/
|accessdate=2020-07-29
}}
}}


Line 665: Line 684:
  |accessdate=2020-05-13
  |accessdate=2020-05-13
}}
}}


==Briefs==
==Briefs==