Circumcision study flaws: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Non-US statements: Add text. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
==Polarity== | ==Polarity== | ||
The medical literature regarding male circumcision is | The medical literature regarding male circumcision is highly polarized. Foreskinned doctors tend to write papers hostile to circumcision, while circumcised doctors tend to write papers in favor of circumcision.<ref name="hill2007" /> | ||
==Statements from medical trade associations== | ==Statements from medical trade associations== | ||
| Line 252: | Line 252: | ||
==US statements== | ==US statements== | ||
The United States is unique because the American medical industry has been promoting the practice of non-therapeutic circumcision since the late 19th Century. | |||
{{REF}} | {{REF}} | ||