Circumcision study flaws: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →US statements: Add citation. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Revise text. |
||
| Line 44: | Line 44: | ||
}}</ref> | }}</ref> | ||
Foreskinned doctors tend to write papers hostile to circumcision, while circumcised doctors tend to write papers in favor of circumcision.<ref name="hill2007" /> Consequently, the medical literature regarding male circumcision is highly argumentative | Foreskinned doctors tend to write papers hostile to circumcision, while [[circumcised doctors]] tend to write papers in favor of circumcision.<ref name="hill2007" /> Consequently, the medical literature regarding male circumcision is highly polarized, argumentative, and [[Bias| biased]]. | ||
==Review of the circumcision literature== | ==Review of the circumcision literature== | ||
| Line 391: | Line 391: | ||
|format= | |format= | ||
|quote=As they saying goes, follow the money. Now you know why neither the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Medical Association, American Academy of Family Physicians, or the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists haven’t condemned this unnecessary surgery, and why their physician members are quick to recommend the procedure to expectant parents. | |quote=As they saying goes, follow the money. Now you know why neither the American Academy of Pediatrics, American Medical Association, American Academy of Family Physicians, or the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists haven’t condemned this unnecessary surgery, and why their physician members are quick to recommend the procedure to expectant parents. | ||
}}</ref> Non-therapeutic circumcision of boys has become the proverbial Goose | }}</ref> Non-therapeutic circumcision of boys has become the proverbial ''Goose That Lays Golden Eggs'',<ref>{{REFweb | ||
|url=http://www.read.gov/aesop/091.html | |url=http://www.read.gov/aesop/091.html | ||
|archived= | |archived= | ||