Circumcision study flaws: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →USA: Add text |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →USA: Add ACOG |
||
| Line 589: | Line 589: | ||
|DOI=10.1542/peds.2012-1990 | |DOI=10.1542/peds.2012-1990 | ||
|accessdate=2020-08-02 | |accessdate=2020-08-02 | ||
}} | |||
The [https://www.acog.org American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists] (ACOG) endorsed the 2012 AAP statement even before it had been published. It promptly put is own statement on its website citing the AAP statement and subtly promoting non-therapeutic male circumcision to expectant mothers. It still cites the AAP statement although that statement expired in 2017. | |||
* {{REFweb | |||
|url=https://www.acog.org/en/Patient%20Resources/FAQs/Labor%20Delivery%20and%20Postpartum%20Care/Newborn%20Male%20Circumcision | |||
|title=Newborn Male Circumcision | |||
|last= | |||
|first= | |||
|accessdate=2020-08-03 | |||
}} | }} | ||