Circumcision study flaws: Difference between revisions
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) →Canada: Correct URL. |
WikiModEn2 (talk | contribs) Add third-party payment. |
||
| Line 339: | Line 339: | ||
|website=http://www.read.gov | |website=http://www.read.gov | ||
|accessdate=2020-08-02 | |accessdate=2020-08-02 | ||
}}</ref> so there is intense interest in keeping the Goose alive. | }}</ref> so there is intense interest in keeping the Goose alive. [[Third-party payment]] is frequently available in the United States. | ||
Several state Medicaid programs stopped paying for non-therapeutic circumcision in the early in the 21st Century. It is believed that this caused alarm in the circumcision industry. Shortly after ''The Lancet'' published two reports on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from sub-Saharan Africa,<ref name="bailey2007">{{REFjournal | Several state Medicaid programs stopped paying for non-therapeutic circumcision in the early in the 21st Century. It is believed that this caused alarm in the circumcision industry. Shortly after ''The Lancet'' published two reports on randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from sub-Saharan Africa,<ref name="bailey2007">{{REFjournal | ||
| Line 649: | Line 649: | ||
{{SEEALSO}} | {{SEEALSO}} | ||
* [[Financial incentive]] | |||
* [[Position statements on infant circumcision]] | * [[Position statements on infant circumcision]] | ||